THE LAW OF DOMINANT THOUGHT

You ever hold an idea in your head FOREVER and wonder if you’re crazy for thinking it, only to eventually discover that it’s been around forever, a bunch of really smart people already knew about it, and you were, in fact, way behind the times?  But how validating when that happens!  I remember this happening when I first discovered Jon Andersen’s Deep Water, and realized there was already a lunatic out there training stupidly hard and not eating carbs and making it work, and suddenly I didn’t feel so alone.  Well this happened again when I discovered the “law of dominant thought”, which states that “the most frequently and intensely held thoughts are the ones that exert the greatest influence on your life and actions”, which is something I have been writing about since the very start of this blog and, in doing so, I felt like I was rallying AGAINST the majority thought process.  It’s so delightful to discover that this was already out there, and, in turn, it gives me even MORE room to maneuver in discussing this principle.  See folks: I’m not as crazy as I seem!

But that's still pretty crazy

 

The way this principle is frequently applied is in the avenue of pursuing behavioral changes.  Specifically, the principle speaks to the idea that, if all we focus on is NOT doing something, we, instead, work against our interest and direct our actions TOWARD the very thing we are wanting to avoid.  Why?  Because the law of dominant thought proports that it is the frequency and intensity of the thoughts that influence our actions, NOT the vector of said thoughts.  That is to say, if I were a smoker, and I wanted to quit smoking, and all I thought about all day was “don’t smoke don’t smoke don’t smoke”, ALL I am thinking about is smoking…which means, I am going to inevitably end up smoking.  If, instead, I were to reframe my thought process and not even think about smoking, and instead think “save $8 (average cost for a pack of cigarettes in the US…holy cow)”, I will achieve my goal of not smoking because my dominant thought is one that supports the goal through a POSITIVE reframe rather than a negative one.  Instead of thinking about how to NOT fail, I am thinking about how to SUCCEED!

 

And herein we see what I’ve been beating the wardrum about for over a decade now: success is NOT about not failing: it’s about succeeding.  And now we find out validate the reality that focusing ON succeeding is, in turn, a necessarily element OF success, and that attempting to focus on mitigation of failure is, in turn, a recipe FOR failure.  Where do we observe this in the realm of physical transformation?  In SO many places.  In the sphere of training, I frequently observe trainees wanting to know HOW to fail.  In the most literal sense, they’ll want to know how, mechanically, to fail the squat, for example.  They’ll want detailed instructions, a video demonstration, and even some honest to goodness practice on failing a squat.  ALL this is doing is creating a dominant thought of FAILURE and, in turn, failure becomes the self-fulfilling prophecy, and these young trainees, in turn, get stuck at a certain weight on their squats and never manage to make any progress…and quite typically this is a PLATRY weight.  Have I ever failed a squat?  Absolutely.  Did I have a PLAN for those failures?  Absolute not!  And each time, my body SOMEHOW managed to find a way to fail the squat WITHOUT any manner of rehearsal.  Meanwhile, I’ve had MANY successful squat sessions that most likely should NOT have happened, to include when I did box squats the week that I ruptured my ACL, tore my meniscus and fractured my patella on a yoke walk in a strongman competition, but with success as my dominant thought, success is what I achieved.

2 days post op I wasn't QUITE as ambitious, but still there was SOMETHING

 

But we also observe this as it relates to training itself.  I have written so much in the past regarding how one must be “all in” as it relates to a training program, and the instant doubt creeps in the program needs to be abandoned.  How significant the “power of belief” is, as it relates to training programs success, and how specifically this relates to programs like Super Squats, Deep Water, Mass Made Simple, etc.  And herein, once again, we see just how the law of dominant thought applies.  If ALL we are thinking about is “I hope I’m not wasting my time with this program”…we’re going to waste our time with this program.  We’re not going to put in the requisite amount of effort, we’re not going to fully comply, we’re going to skirt the hard work, stupidly adjust things that should not be tweaked with, and ultimately squander the time invested in the program by not succeeding on it.  I see this with all the doubting questions that come across.  “Do I REALLY need to drink a gallon of milk a day for Super Squats?”  “Do I REALLY need to cut out carbs when I follow Deep Water?”  And know what the real comedy of all this is?  If these folks would just stop ASKING for permission and write their own destiny, they WOULD succeed!  If the thought process was just “I’m going to grow because I’m running Super Squats”, they’d grow.  But by thinking “Can I grow WITHOUT drinking the gallon of milk a day?”, their fate is sealed.

 

Hey, while I’m talking about a gallon of milk, let’s talk about nutrition, because boy oh boy do we see this happen there.  I have frequently addressed the notion that, when the goal is gaining: the goal is GAINING.  The goal of gaining is NOT minimizing fat.  But, reference my recent post of “I had it easier”, because of stupid social media influence and unrealistic standards, trainees have it in their heads that they HAVE to have razor sharp abs 365 days a year and that putting on an ounce of fat during a gaining phase is some sort of unredeemable sin.  And so, during their gaining phase, their most dominant thought it “don’t get fat”…and, funny enough, that’s exactly what happens.  Instead of thinking “get muscular”, making THAT the dominant thought, and achieving that, they are SO hyperfixated on not getting fat that they end up jacking up their cortisol levels by training stupidly hard with an inadequate amount of recovery via nutrition, and the body “rewards” them by breaking down muscle tissue and upping bodyfat, resulting in a wonderfully underwhelming skinnyfat physique.

Notice how the bully doesn't have a six pack...and how it doesn't matter

 

And in the realm of fat loss, these trainees living in a state of frequent denial thinking “don’t cheat don’t cheat”…they cheat.  “Don’t binge don’t binge”…they binge.  These folks are so hyperfixated on what they are DENYING themselves that, in turn, their dominant thoughts set them up for a pattern of restrict, binge, restrict HARDER, binge HARDER, repeat, and ultimately achieve nothing.  I’ve written about my experiences with Vince Gironda’s Maximum Definition Diet, and the entire time I’ve undertaken it, never once did I lament all the foods I “couldn’t eat”: instead, I was absolutely overjoyed thinking about what I GOT to eat: all the meat and eggs I want.  And without counting calories or macros, my dominant thought was “I’m going to get lean”…and that’s exactly what happened.  Whereas, if I obsessed and thought “I can’t get lean without counting calories”…I’d be right about that too.

 

Honestly, this is too easy to write about, and this post could get stupidly long, so I’m going to cut it at this point just because we’ve already covered training and nutrition and how this law applies.  But seriously, dear reader, consider how simple this principle is and how to apply it to your own path of physical transformation.  When all we focus on is how to not fail, all we achieve IS failure.  When we flip the vector toward how can we succeed, that is what we accomplish.  Approach all avenues of physical transformation with a mindset of “how will I succeed at this”, and you will guide yourself exactly where you need to be.      

IT’S NOT A CORNDOG: IT’S A BOMBPOP

As the weather warms up and county fairs and summer time treats come into the horizon view, my mind is easily pre-occupied with visions of gluttony and excess and, due to the twisted nature of my brain, I find ways to make these analogies for training, so here we go.  In today’s discussion, I present two stick based treats: the corndog and the bomb pop.  Yes, these treats are already inherently different, in that one is savory and the other is sweet (of course, assuming their base forms, for I am well aware of the corndog mutations out there that are dessert like along with, apparently, “spicy bomb pops”, to which I say “what is wrong with you?!), but they do, of course, share the commonality of a stick based delivery mechanism.  However, it’s not the savory vs sweetness that I wish to focus on here, but more the intended manner of enjoyment.  Enjoyment?  Isn’t it obvious?  They’re a food: you eat them!  Yes dear reader, but HOW do you eat them?  For, you see, the manner that we enjoy the corndog is NOT the manner that we enjoy the bomb pop, and, in turn, when looking at training through the lens of carnival delights, we must understand that our training is far more bomb pop like in nature than it is a corndog.  Allow me to explain…for otherwise, this is just sheer lunacy.

People out there are hot and dry, they're going to want something cold and wet: how hard is it to understand?!

For the briefest of introductions, for those of you poor deprived souls that have enjoyed neither the delights of a corndog OR a bomb pop: a corndog is a festive treat featuring a hotdog impaled on a stick that is then dipped in a cornbread (hench “corn”dog) batter and deep fried.  It’s is absolutely as decadent and needless as it sounds.  A bomb pop, meanwhile, is a popsicle delight featuring 3 distinct flavors: cherry, lime, and blue raspberry (traditionally), which, in turn, give it it’s distinct American flag coloring of red, white and blue (yes, a white lime, and we artificially colored the raspberry, because that’s how we roll).  What’s particularly unique about the bomb pop is that it’s colored in stages: a red top, white middle, and blue base.  It is this distinction that I wish to key in on.

 

When one enjoys either one of these treats, the expectation tends to be that they are consumed top to bottom.  If one took a bite out of the bottom or middle first, they would compromise the structural integrity of the treat: it would fall off the stick.  Meanwhile, when one starts at the top, one: they have less chance of biting the stick (no joke: that’s how I lost a tooth in elementary school) and, as they continue to consume the treat, they can slide the bottom toward the top, maintaining structural integrity while still minimizing risk of stick biting.  However, BECAUSE of this convention, one has a different experience consuming a corndog vs a bomb pop.  For one when takes a bite out of the corndog, they consume ALL the flavors of the corndog at once.  They get the taste of the cornbread AND the hotdog contained inside.  If they applied some manner of condiment OR if they dipped the corndog in something (nacho cheese is a popular choice, because we are decadent like that, and ketchup is, of course, controversial), those flavors combine with the cornbread and hotdog all in the same bite.  Meanwhile, when one bites into the bomb pop, they only get one flavor in that bite, at MOST two flavors if they’re strategic in their consumption and manage to bite at the dividing line of flavors just to intentionally indulge in two flavors at once.  In order to achieve this solo flavor experience with the corndog, one would have to intentionally eat the cornbread around the corndog first, leaving the hotdog behind, and THEN consume the hotdog on the stick, which, yeah, SOME people do…but it is considered deviant!  Meanwhile, in order to attempt to consume all the flavors of the bomb pop at once, one would essentially have to consume the popsicle in whole, and endure QUITE the brain freeze in the attempt.

 

Once again, props if you actually get this reference

That was a LOT of writing about eating corndogs and bomb pops, but here’s the payoff: our training is far more bomb pop than it is corndog!  Far too many trainees want to experience ALL the flavors at once, and in doing so they anticipate a corndog experience, only to be met with brain freeze.  Training’s function is to improve physical capabilities, and the improvement of capabilities requires a focus on said improvement.  We must be diligent and intentional in our efforts, and, per Dan John, our goal, is “to keep the goal the goal”.  When we are in a mass gaining phase of training, we must let conditioning be on the back burner, understanding that we will get to it LATER in the bomb pop of training.  Mass is, currently, the cherry flavor, and conditioning awaits us in the lime.  When we attempt to merge these flavors together at the same time, we do not get an enjoyable corndog flavor experience, but instead quite literally bite off more than we can chew and endure the freeze and pain of the situation.  But when we take our time to maximize the intent of the training phase, we get the most we can out of that phase, and then move on to the next one, holding onto those newfound abilities and capabilities as we enjoy a new flavor, until we get all the way through the bomb pop and move on to the next one.

 

From the 1000 mile view, we can look at these two treats and say “What’s the difference: they’re both food on a stick”, but as we examine just the slightest bit closer, we understand that these are truly different experiences despite a similarity in being stick-based.  The same is true of training.  It’s easy to convince ourselves “it’s all just training: as long as I recover I’ll be fine”, but it becomes a question of, simply because it’s “fine”: is it good?  Yes: you can one-bite a bomb pop and yes, you can peel the cornbread off a corn dog and have a meal of a hotdog alongside cornbread…but are you actually having the intended experience of either product?  Exercise the discipline necessary to train the right way at the right time in order to achieve your overall goals and you WILL achieve those goals.  If you put your ego and psychological need to always do everything all the time ahead of your desire to actually achieve your goals, you’ll be stasis locked with brain freeze, and that’s not a fun summertime for anyone.  

MY EXPERIENCE WITH VINCE GIRONDA’S “MAXIMUM DEFINITION DIET” AKA: "THE STEAK AND EGGS DIET"

Greetings once again dear readers as I continue to annoy you with my constant adventures in the world of nutritional weirdness, as today will be absolutely no exception as I detail my experiences with the works of one of nutrition’s greatest eccentrics: Vince Gironda.  For those that are unaware (shame on you!), Vince was a pioneer in the world of golden era bodybuilding training and nutrition, famous for telling Arnold Schwarzenegger that he was fat and for prescribing a diet of 36 raw eggs per day mixed with half and half (among other things), and also famous for possessing an absolutely bonkers physique that would STILL turn heads today.  Alongside Rheo Blair, Vince was one of the OG dieting gurus that serious bodybuilders turned to in order to achieve the “next level”, and he was adamantly against the use of steroids, which, if nothing else, was reflected in his nutritional approach based on how hard he was attempting to achieve optimal hormonal balance in the ABSENCE of chemical assistance.  All this to say, for a trainee not employing steroids to achieve a supraphysiological level of testosterone OR using exogenous insulin in order to assimilate carbohydrates at a level beyond normal human functional capacity, I felt like his suggestions were at least worth TRYING.  If nothing else, you know that I get bored to tears at the idea of just calculating a TDEE and then weighing and tracking macros and calories, so of COURSE I had to give Vince’s methods a try.

He lived to be 80 years old, enjoyed a meat and eggs diet, and looked like this in 1951: he's worth listening to.  

 

Plus, I had always WANTED to follow the Maximum Definition Diet, because I had always heard it referred to as the “steak and eggs diet”.  And, since there is VERY little reported experience on this diet, I decided to create the content I wanted to read.

 

THE “STEAK AND EGGS DIET” ISN’T

 

Amazingly enough, it's NOT this

So to start, once again, the telephone game came into effect, because though I had always heard this referred to as the “steak and eggs diet”, and even seen many people report on this AS the “steak and eggs diet”, that is NOT what Vince Gironda calls this diet.  His title for it is “The Maximum Definition Diet”, and, in turn, “steak and eggs” are NOT the only thing consumed in the diet. 

 

THE MAXIMUM DEFINITION DIET IS

It certainly FEELS like this

 

So what are the “rules” of the Maximum Definition Diet?  Vince lays it out simply in his book “Unleashing the Wild Physique”, wherein he states “All carbohydrates must be removed from your menu.  The only milk products that can be sued are butter and cream.  Meat, fish, and eggs are the only food permissible.  You must, however, eat a high carbohydrarte meal every four or five days (ie, pasta, potato, grain, fruit); otherwise your muscles will smooth out and your strength will decrease)”, although it’s worth also appreciating that, later in the same passage he writes “remember to have a high-carbohydrate meal with no protein every third or fourth day to replenish glycogen to your muscles”, so he wavers a bit on the 4 to 5 days vs 3 to 4 days.

 

And, of course, I know you number crunchers are wanting to know “ok, but HOW much meat, fish and eggs do I eat?”  And here is what I loved about the diet.  This is what is listed for breakfast.

 

 

Curious about lunch?

 

 

Ready for a big surprise for dinner?

 

 

Have I found the perfect diet or what?! 

Is it too good to be true?!

 

However, it’s not all a bed of roses (a bed of bacon?  What the hell is the meat and eggs equivalent here?) because Vince was a big fan of supplementation, and his requirements for this diet were extensive to say the last.  Here is what he wanted for breakfast

 

For lunch and dinner, it was less extensive

And THEN there was the last of special supplements

 

 

Vince spends a significant portion of his book detailing the benefits of every single supplement prescribed, so it’s not like he just shoves the reader a handful of pills and says “Here, take this”, like Matt Dimel did to Dave Tate, but suffice it to say: it’s an EXTENSIVE list of supplements on this diet.  But, in fairness: it’s not just THIS diet he does this with.  All of the diets in his book (“The Advanced Maintenance Diet”, “The Hormone Precursor Diet”, “The Weight Gaining Diet”, and “The Lacto-Vegetarian Diet”) have a laundry list of supplements associated with it, which speaks to the idea that Vince didn’t feel like the Maximum Definition Diet was criminally deficient in certain nutrients, but that ALL diets required supplementation to be effective.

 

SO WHAT ARE WE REALLY LOOKING AT HERE

 

Who says the menu is limited?

I genuinely don’t know if Vince was fully versed in the notion of a ketogenic diet/ketosis, but it’s definitely what he created here and acknowledged in his own words by saying “the diet works so well for defining muscles because fats are used as a source of fuel for the body.  Since it is difficult for the body to convert fat into energy, this results in a loss of your existing body fat.”  And, when paired with his 3-5 day carbohydrate refeed, we effectively have a cyclical ketogenic diet.  However, Vince was smart to avoid some of the pitfalls that people fall into with ketogenic diets as it relates to fat loss by severely limiting the menu to meat, eggs, butter and cream. 

 

The limited dairy, in particular, is absolutely the right call for someone pursuing fat loss, because so many folks on the keto train end up going off the rails due to cheese.  Cheese is hyperpaltatable and not satiating, meaning when you eat it, you just want to keep eating more of a it, and you never really fill up on it (barring those with allergies/intolerances).  This also excludes all manners of yogurt, cottage cheese, sour cream, etc etc.  And since there’s no coffee to speak of, no one is going to be drinking cream or butter under the justification of “it’s bulletproof!” 

 

This also means we no longer have the downfall associated with sauces.  Mayo is a commonly appreciated keto condiment, and it’s not on the menu, nor is any other sort of creamy low/zero carb sauce that can rapidly add up energy in the diet.

 

The absence of nuts/seeds are ALSO incredible beneficial here as it relates to a goal of maximum definition.  Nuts and nut butters are INCREDIBLY energy dense and very easy to overconsume.  The serving size of peanut butter almost seems like a joke when you actually see it laid out in front of you, as is the serving for cashews.  Keeping these out of the diet goes far in limiting the damage one can do in a diet.

Granted, the overconsumption of peanuts CAN make you like Bill West here...but it won't make you Vince Gironda

Even the removal of veggies goes far, because often trainees eat these to excess in an attempt to fill the gut/avoid hunger, which for 1: doesn’t work, and secondly, in the realm of keto, these tends to be used as a vehicle to transport butter and other sauces to the mouth. 

 

By keeping the focus on ONLY meat and eggs, Vince has found an effective mechanism to regulate the intake of the trainee WITHOUT having to resort to counting calories or artificial restriction.  For those of you out there that think you can get fat eating JUST meat and eggs: try it.  Try ONLY meat and eggs: no sauces, no sides, only butter or cream to cook the eggs in, as much as you can.  Your body will eventually say “I’m full” and you won’t want to eat any more.

 

HOW I DEVIATED

 

With so few options, you wouldn't think it'd be possible to f**k it up

Of course, you know me: I can’t do anything as prescribed. 

 

The most obvious: I did NOT follow the supplement prescription.  I didn’t even try.  I have no idea if I could even FIND most of that stuff.  But, I am sponsored by BioTest and have access to a lot of awesome supplements as a result, which means I WAS taking stuff like Creatine, Resveratrol, Vitamin D, Curcumin, DHA-rich Fish Oil, Forskolin, Magnesium, Zinc, Selenium, Chromium, Vanadium, Eurycoma longifolia, Vitamin K-2, Punicalagins, Lycopene, Cranberry concentrate, and before my high carb meal I’d have Cyanidin 3-Glycoside.  In addition, rather than taking liver tablets, I just took it upon myself to have beef liver with my breakfast meal. 

 

Another major deviation: I only had 2 meals solid a day, rather than 3.  As I wrote above: meat and eggs are VERY satiating, and I, quite frankly, just plain didn’t need to eat that much.  I’d have a hearty breakfast (will detail below) and would typically feel satiated until my evening meal.  On days where I had a lunch obligation (going out as a family, meeting friends, etc), I’d fast through breakfast that morning and do an old school intermittent fasting approach, having a tighter eating window of 5-6 hours with a lunch and dinner meal. That said, for the sake of ensuring adequate protein intake, I WOULD have a 1 scoop protein shake in water at night.  Typically, at some point in the night, my dog would need to get up to pee (she’s 15 years old, it’s amazing she’s gone on this long), and I’d use that as an opportunity to drink my shake and get back to bed.  The shake itself is a deviation, as it’s neither meat, egg, butter or cream, but it was at least dairy based.  I DID contemplate going hardcore and making a shake of egg whites and raw eggs, and it might be something I do on another attempt to really meet intent here, but this was close enough.

 

The two meals a day wasn’t an original thought of mine, but actually something I had read from Dr. Robert Kiltz, when he discussed this diet on his own website.  Once again, via the telephone game, I was exposed to Kiltz’ interpretation BEFORE I actually read Gironda’s original work on it.

 

The final major deviation is a 2-parter: for the high carb meal, I only had it once a week, and it was a meal that included carbs, fats and proteins.  I’m still a family man, and similar to my experience with the Velocity Diet, I wasn’t going to make my family suffer just so I could be a superior meathead.  On Sunday nights, we have a family meal where we all come together, make something yummy, and enjoy each other’s company.  This was typically a pasta meal with meat sauce or some sort of midwestern style casserole dish with a pasta base, and it was joined with some homemade cookies or cheesecake that I would top with some raw local honey. 

 

I had some minor deviations along the way as well.  I’d occasionally have a slice of Sargento thin sliced cheese with my weekend breakfasts, and if we ate out there was a chance my food was cooked in oil instead of butter or cream, but these weren’t gamechangers.

 

A SAMPLE DAY

 

I always feel like I'm doing this when I write these up

0400: Wake up, take creatine, applecider vinegar, Forskolin, Vitamin-D, Reveratrol, Fish oil

0430-0540: Tactical Barbell lifting workout

0615: Breakfast
* 12.5oz of grassfed leg of lamb, air fried in grassfed beef tallow
* An omelet of 3 pastured eggs, 5 whites and a tablespoon of grassfed tallow
* A piece of beef liver

1700: Dinner
* Same omelet as breakfast
* 12-18oz of some sort of (preferably red) meat

1800-1900: Evening walk with the family

2000: Take fish oil, Curcumin, Magnesium, Zinc, Selenium, Chromium, Vanadium, Eurycoma longifolia and Vitamin K-2

2300: 1 scoop protein shake with Punicalagins, Lycopene and Cranberry concentrate tablets

 

That omelet, in particular, was primarily a creation of frugality beyond anything else.  Egg whites are cheaper than pastured eggs, so it was easy to bulk up the omelet and get more protein in the diet by leaning heavier into the whites vs the whole eggs.  I added a tablespoon of grassfed tallow as a means to get the fats “back” that were missing from the whites.

 

WHAT I OBSERVED

 

Keep in mind there is always a potential bias

This diet was excellent for habit breaking.  I’ve done restrictive diets before, like the Velocity Diet, and found a similar effect, but with Vince really making the cut clean and what is and is not allowed, I felt as though the gauntlet had been thrown down and it was on me to comply.  Know what wasn’t on the list? Gum.  And I definitely had a problem with that (detailed in an earlier blog post), which I’m now well over 2 months sober from my last stick of the stuff, whereas before I was going through nearly a pack a day.  From there, I got rid of other sweet tastes, specifically the stevia that was in my electrolytes, opting for the unflavored version instead.  I also had to give up my beloved sour cream, my absolute FAVORITE condiment, due to having grown up in San Diego and having access to the most wonderful Mexican food in the world.  Instead, I grew an appreciation for tallow.

 

I’d never used tallow before, and wasn’t really very familiar with it, but in keeping with the rules, I felt it fell in line with the “meat: any kind” instruction.  I’m not the biggest fan of butter, and found tallow far more palatable (pun intended) for cooking and adding fat to meals.  There’s something satisfying about mixing tallow into egg whites, like we’re making our own Frankenfood.  The fats from the yolk were removed and replaced with fats from grassfed ruminants.  And I even took to rendering my own tallow through the process: collecting jars from the meals I was cooking, which became self-perpetuating: I’d use tallow, then gather tallow that I could then use again.

 

I had zero issues with energy as it relates to training or just throughout the day.  No spikes or crashes, very stable clean and even hum.  And even after my weekly high carb meals, I felt fine.  There was one meal where I got a bit of carb sweats, but otherwise my system was pretty capable of switching between fuel sources.  Since my high carb meal was Sunday evening, it would fuel my Monday morning lifting session, and my Tuesday workout was a high intensity conditioning session, which made the most of my available energy sources, similar to what Dan Douchine prescribed in “Body Opus” (which I’ll have to write up a review of sometime).

 

Vince is definitely correct in his assessment that, in the absence of carbs, the muscles with smooth out.  Typically, by the end of the week, I would look flat and washed out and therefore “fatter”.  When this happens, it’s easy to get in your head and think “I better avoid that high carb meal: I’m getting too fat!”, but, in truth, you gotta lean into that meal even more at that point, as, typically, 2 days later, I was stupidly shredded.

 

And perhaps this is just me, but I bring up the analogy of “like a dog with kibble” when it comes to this diet.  The breakfast I listed above was a breakfast I had for 3 weeks in a row, because Costco had a great deal on leg of lamb.  In turn, for 3 weeks, I’d wake up at 0400 and think to myself “once I get this workout done: I get to have breakfast!”  Every single time I sat down for breakfast, I was SO excited to be able to eat like that, and when the day was over, I was excited to do it all over again.  This wasn’t being a “food addict”, where I had a bunch of food noise in the background distracting me from life, nor was I obsessing over what/when I was going to eat next: I was just genuinely EXCITED to eat this way.  If nothing else, that’s the sign of a diet that fits you.  Find you one like that.

 

THE RESULTS

Try and top THIS before/after

 

I started the Maximum Definition Diet weighing 82.1kg, and in 6 weeks dropped to 79.2, a weight loss rate of 1lb per week.  That is a rate of weight loss that most internet gurus will tell you is ideal as far as preserving muscle goes, and it was done without having to count calories, weigh or track food.  And I firmly believe muscle has been spared, as during this time I’ve advanced in all my lifts on Tactical Barbell Operator (per my most recent write-up of the program), and even set a recent deadlift PR (by bodyweight) of 15x405lbs at a bodyweight of 176lbs.

 

And, of course, in getting lighter, I got leaner.  Abs came in fuller, I lost the little bit of lower belly pooch, and just tightened up in general.   Of which, I don't have photos, but you can see my general leanness in this video

 

THE FUTURE

 

Look to the past for the future

Honestly, I can see myself eating like this for the rest of my life.  I feel like keeping it at 2 meals vs through helps improve the sustainability, and the weekly carb up helps with sanity/balance in the family.  However, I’m not throwing out the Feast/Famine/Ferocity, Apex Predator Diet or Velocity Diet with the bathwater here.  All the tools and tricks I’ve picked up leading up to this can still find a place, and I may find myself in a situation where living off protein shakes for a few weeks is just what I need to re-orient myself.  But, if nothing else, after I get back from my cruise vacation in the middle of June, I’ll be hopping right back onto the Maximum Definition Diet (I’ve already got 16lbs of leg of lamb in my freezer awaiting my return) leading up to my next Strongman Competition at the end of Jul.  From there, I may look to tweak the diet to support weight GAIN leading through the holidays.

 

Thanks for reading!