I am big on only writing about what I know and what I’ve experienced, so whenever I DON’T do that I like to clarify. Often, these wild ideas pan out well (like the 6 month gaining block I developed with 5/3/1 BBB Beefcake, Building the Monolith and Deep Water), but not ALL of the are winners. What I’m going to detail below are spitballing and theories. Some might work, some might not, but it’s fun to dream.
From the champion of crackpot ideas himself!
---
* This one is a quick kill, but if you recall my “strongman on the road” series of posts (http://mythicalstrength.blogspot.com/2020/10/strongman-on-road-part-i-nutrition.html) you’ll remember the circus tent of food I would need to pack to sustain myself without having to eat garbage the whole time I’m away from home. Apex Predator/Velocity makes SO much more sense. Throw a bag or two of protein powder in the suitcase and get in ONE meal a day otherwise. High speed/low drag. I could still pack some food too, going with canned chicken breasts and be squared away, or get a couple of rotisserie chickens and be good to go. That’s definitely my next travel plan.
* Despite the fact that this evolution came about as a result of me being absolutely destroyed from Super Squats, I remain a huge fan of Super Squats IN TOTALITY. So not just the program, but “the program”: the workout AND the nutrition AND the book. “High speed/low drag”: shut your brain off, do the squats and drink the milk. You do it and you get the results and you grow. It’s also why I liked the Velocity Diet/Apex Predator: Drink the shakes, eat the meal, done. No counting or thinking. Well to solve the “how to train” portion of that, I think Dan John’s 10k kettlebell swing challenge is the answer, for a variety of reasons that I’m going to detail below this bullet.
Seriously: Dan talks and I listen...and go buy his "Easy Strength Omnibook" as soon as you're done reading this blog (https://danjohnuniversity.com/bookstore)
* My recent posts on duality (http://mythicalstrength.blogspot.com/2023/02/periodization-via-duality.html) have spoken to the very concept of “undoing” a program after doing it, and 10k swings is precisely that. With Super Squats, there is minimal hinging. In fact, if you run the abbreviated version, there is NO hinging. But there is a LOT of squatting. With the 10k swing, it’s the opposite: you are doing nothing but hinging. There’s room for squatting if you want it, but it’s not required. So if you were to bounce the two against each other, doing 6 weeks of Super Squats and then the 28 days of the 10k swing challenge, there’s a fair chance that, over the course of your training history, you’ll maintain balance.
* Alongside that, Super Squats is laser focused on gaining weight and minimizing exertion outside of the training sphere. “Don’t run when you can walk, don’t walk when you can stand, etc”. 10k swing is, of course, the opposite: not heavy on the static strength, very conditioning focused. The Velocity Diet also speaks to being “movement seeking”, so that pairs well there too. Again: periodization here. You’ll have an accumulation phase and a GPP phase.
* What’s really neat about 10k swing challenge and the Velocity Diet is BOTH are 28 day challenges, so they map on perfectly with each other there. The Apex Predator is meant to be a bit more “long term sustainable”, but depending on how lean you are at the end of Super Squats, either can be just dandy.
Looks like it can get you pretty lean!
* If there’s a concern about building/maintaining strength while running the 10k swing challenge, I feel like there’s an avenue to include Dan John’s “Easy Strength” program in there for the strength work. This maps on well with the 10k swing challenge, as Easy Strength is done 5 days a week, just like 10k swing, and the workouts are supposed to run about 15 minutes long so you have time to do “the stuff that REALLY matters”, which, in this case, would be the swings. It only gets a little messy because Easy Strength is a 40 day program vs 28, so we lose a little bit of the “shut off the brain” element here. But still: it seems effective enough. And Easy Strength is still “squat avoidant”, so you would still be able to heal from Super Squats.
* I write about Super Squats a lot, because it’s what I know, but if you wanted to make this a 100% Dan John run, I feel like “Mass Made Simple” would be a fantastic swap. His book also lays out exactly what to do and when to do it. It doesn’t have a 100% prescriptive diet, but Dan’s “eat like an adult” is a solid starting point, and his golden ticket is the peanut butter and jelly sandwich, which is just plain awesome. You still squat a TON of Dan’s program, but there’s also barbell complexes in it, so you have a chance to maintain your fitness a bit better.
Another book you should go buy after reading this blog
* For myself, I can foresee me eventually coming off of shakes for the majority of my meals, but I still see myself keeping them around as needed. I could see implementing either alternating days of Apex Predator/Velocity and a more “normal” dietary approach (more solid food on the harder training days/more shakes on the easier), or keeping days consistent and relying on shakes for my breakfast, pre-bed meal, and snacks here and there. There’s also the chance of modifying the shakes themselves to make them a little more substantial: mixing them with egg whites and nutbutters. The primary driver here being that I keep losing fat with this approach despite it not being my goal, so if I find myself in a harder phase of training, or simply wanting to maintain, I feel like this would be the more logical approach vs trying to get in a TON of calories in the limited amount of solid meals I’m taking in.
I’ve written extensively on the idea of how training drives nutrition, and this was honestly no exception. Despite the fact I opened with a discussion on how my nutrition radically changed, it’s worth appreciating that I changed my training FIRST and simply picked this dietary approach to match that training. I knew I was going to employ a protocol that wasn’t oriented toward gaining size, and that this protocol was going to allow my hybrid diet to function. Had I stayed with something like Super Squats, I’d have eaten the diet that supports that. So all that said…
THE SITUATION
Yeah that about sums it up
* As I wrote in the previous section: my body was BROKEN after that final run of Super Squats. I gave a LOT of myself to get that 20x405, and it was time to heal. Along with that, looming over my head was my annual 10 mile race that the Mrs and I did. I had about 6 weeks to go from 20x405 Super Squats shape to 10 mile running shape, and I had ZERO desire to do any running to prep for this.
* I was VERY good at being big and strong at this point. My static lifts were high. My conditioning had fallen apart, primarily because my body was so damaged that, outside of the specific lifts of Super Squats, I couldn’t do much. My elbows were so shot that chins and dips were non-viable, to say nothing of cleans, most kettlebell work: even burpees were a struggle, as getting on and off the floor was excruciating. I was also accustomed to resting between sets at this point, having abandoned my typical super/giant set protocol in order to meet the demands of Super Squats.
THE STRATEGY
When in doubt
* I opened up my copy of 5/3/1 Forever, having written previously about how 6 weeks of a 5/3/1 program would be a great counter to Super Squats. My goal was to find something that had sets of 5 making up the majority of the work alongside a heavy emphasis on conditioning. It was all about duality I’d written of previously: many sets of 5 vs one set of 20. I ended up settling on Krypteia, specifically phase 1. Jim wrote about how this was the phase used to prep trainees for the later phases of training, and a prep phase was exactly what I was looking for. Something meant to whip me back into shape. Other contenders included Fat Loss and Prep and 5x5 FSL, but I dug the inclusion of dips, chins, DB SLDLs and DB squats in Krypteia, along with the time limit restriction. It seemed like everything I needed: shorter training time, intense compressed volume, low rep sets, chins, dips, and a chance to get some reps in on the lower body stuff. I DID give some serious consideration to Dan John’s Easy Strength (after having devoured his Omnibook), so I could get in and out of the weightroom and focus more on running, but decided to save that for another time.
* Prior to starting, I deloaded. This deload coincided with me starting my new diet, and I decided “high speed/low drag” was the theme, so I settled on a week of the following workout: 30 minutes a day, Mon-Fri, 1 round of burpee chins, then run around my block (turned out to be a little over 1/4 mile). Max rounds in 30 minutes. I started with bodyweight and sets of 8 on the burpee chins for day 1, and then put on a 10lb weight vest for sets of 7 on day 2. I’d add 5lbs to the vest each day while taking away a rep from the burpee chins. On the weekends, I played it by ear and got in whatever I could. I kept my daily work where possible, but didn’t stress over it. This definitely had a positive impact: the weighted vest was barely any real load on my body, which meant I had a week of time to let my body bounce back from the thrashing it had been suffering. Super Squats had it so that every other day I was beating my body to hell, and I could tell it had discovered that pattern. Giving it just 2 days of break itself was enough to feel it start to really heal up, and by the end of the week my elbow pain was gone. I still ached in my hips and knee, but it was moving in the right direction. And getting in that little bit of running helped my body remember how it felt to move through space again.
* Before I discuss Krypteia in depth, if you want, here I am running a full 3 week cycle. If a picture is worth 1000 words, let this speak for itself.
* As far as “making it mine” went, the big thing I did was try to get each workout done as fast as possible. Jim laid out the challenge to get it done in under 45 minutes, and I absolutely met that goal (the final deadlift workout came close, at 43 minutes), but had a few workouts that finished in the 20s. This technically went against Jim’s guidance to not turn these workouts into conditioning workouts, but, again, I needed to undo the damage of Super Squats, and that included getting my conditioning back and getting back to “no break” training.
EXPERIENCES AND LESSONS LEARNED
This is too accurate
* As much as I’m the first to say “it’s assistance work: it doesn’t matter”, I was honestly the mandated assistance protocol of Krypteia that drew me in, and it was exactly what I needed. Once again, my goal was basically to “undo” Super Squats, so I needed something that had me moving in a totally different direction. Super Squats had me laser-focused on making 1 big lift get as big as possible: now the big lifts were stagnant and it was ONLY the assistance that was progressing. And I made it a goal to make them move as hard as possible. My dips, chins, DB SLDLs with a shrug and KB/DB goblet squats moved right along the whole time, and, in turn: my body healed. I was able to focus on weaker areas and smaller muscles and not beat myself into the ground with stupidly heavy compounds. The time limit forced me to keep things light and move quick, and I had to pick intelligent TMs.
* This also marked my first time pulling over 400lbs since I tore those muscles in the program before my final run of Super Squats. I set a TM that was 20lbs lower than my squat, which is atypical for me, but it was necessary to stay within my limits. I also used an axle 2 of the 3 weeks, because it forced me to slow down and not jerk the weight off of the floor. I used a deadlift bar for the final week and it felt solid.
* Meanwhile, for squats, I rotated between SSB squats on the 3s week, front squats for the 5s and buffalo bar for the 1s. My body was so wrecked from using the same bar every day for Super Squats that I had to get far away from the Buffalo Bar for a while. My TM was too high for the SSB to be able to hit the topset, but, otherwise, I made good choices. Front squats work well for Krypteia because it’s just sets of 5. Higher reps would be difficult.
* I’d run Krytpeia M-Tues-Thurs-Fri, and on Wed for 2 of the weeks I did a 5 mile run, to prep for the 10 mile race I had with the wife. The first week, my schedule got compressed and I ran all 4 days in a row and got in some sort of conditioning on the other 3 days that week.
* I honestly really liked Krypteia, and had full intentions of actually seeing it all the way through…until Jamie Lewis released his updated “Feast, Famine and Ferocity Diet” e-book, which completely grabbed me and took me in yet another wild direction…
CHAOS IS THE PLAN…THE PLAN
Jamie must know this about me by now
* Before I discuss further, here’s the link for the book
* It boils down to this: Jamie sells something, I buy it. I am such a fan of everything he puts out that, any chance I have to support him, I take it. Hell, I was running his Apex Predator Diet and it had effectively saved me from myself, so I owed him that much. I’m also the same with Jim Wendler, Jon Andersen, Brian Alsruhe, etc. Support those that are making a difference. So when Jamie released this book, even though I already had a diet and training protocol I was following, I still bought it and read it with zero intention of following it. Fun fact: that exact same thing happened the first time I read the Super Squats book: I was reading it purely for academic interest…and just like that situation, I finished up Jamie’s book and suddenly scrapped my current plan of Krypteia and had a new plan: the “Famine Workout”.
* Jamie structures the whole protocol where you open with “Famine” and progress to “Feast”. I don’t want to spoil the book (seriously, buy it), but it’s premised around mankind naturally having “seasons” of activity and nutrition, and modeling that on a microlevel to drive individual progress. There are lean times, where we’re doing lots of work, and there are fat times, where we feast and celebrate. This mirrors exactly with stuff Dan John has written about, and coincides with my phasic approach to training and nutrition as well. It was an excellent fit, and it mapped on to how I was currently eating…for the most part.
There was an adjustment to be sure
* Whereas Jamie’s Apex Predator diet has solid food meals built into it, as does the Velocity Diet, the “Famine” diet was purely protein shakes as a protein sparing modified fast. I flat out wasn’t going to do that, for the “family man” reasons outlined previously…BUT I did have a few days while running the program that I was actually able to pull that off due to how my schedule shook out. But the Apex Predator diet was working enough magic while running the program that I was still meeting the intent: I was leaning out while I was training.
* The training itself was such a RADICAL departure of everything I was doing that it was absolutely what I needed. And Jamie has always been on my wavelength as far as training/nutrition goes. There’s minimal use of percentages, no calorie counting, and options for lifting 3-4 times a week or 5-6 times a week. Jamie also has his own version of daily work programmed into it, which I’m a fan of. Otherwise, you open each day with heavy work and chase it with high reps, which is what I’ve learned works for me in periods of reduced calories. I’m good for 1-2 big sets, and then after that it’s just pump work. Always good to get that validation.
* One of his training days is something called “Dealer’s Choice”, where you train whatever you want for up to 90 minutes, which is honestly one of the smartest things I’ve ever seen in a program. THINK about how many times people screw up a good program because they want to keep adding and tweaking it, self-included? I caught myself thinking “I’ll get in my lateral raises on this day, poundstone curls on this day, shrugs on this day”, and then when I got to “Dealer’s Choice” I said “Oh: I’ll just put them all in on THAT day”. It’s just the perfecting holding bin for bad ideas, and you can just get them all out of your system on that one day and then get on with your life. I can absolutely see myself carrying that into other training programs.
You know what, knock yourself out...maybe literally
* Part of Jamie’s daily work is a mandatory 2-3 mile walk outside. He’s very clear that this isn’t a workout: it’s living. I really dig it. And forcing myself outside for a walk everyday has been awesome. However, since I train at o’dark stupid, I don’t always get the “vitamin D” benefit.
* As of my writing this, I have finished out two weeks of the program, and between week 1 and 2, on my squat workout, I went from 4 triples of 405 on the SSB to 3x4 and 1x3, and then went from a 33 rep deathset of 205lbs to 43 reps. That was nuts. My dealer’s choice day also saw some great growth. I am also EXHAUSTED, but I can still turn up amazing performances in the gym. This second week coincided with me working a solid week of 12 hour shifts at work and sleeping 5 hours a night, so I’m really living the “famine” lifestyle here.
* For the first week, I ran the program VERY close to what was prescribed. I would superset the ab work with some other work for the sake of time, because these workouts would take a long time. After running it as written for the first week, I felt like I had gotten enough of a feel for the intent of the program, and allowed myself to start shortening rest times and playing around with super/giantsets in order to make things a little more time efficient. Thankfully, Jamie is more than ok with experimentation, so it all fits.
The precedent is there to be jacked AND experimental
* That said, I had to re-arrange the order of the days so that I ran all the lifting back to back and moved the days off to the weekend, as that fit my work schedule better. Also, on the first week, instead of doing 30 minutes of push ups, squats, etc etc, I ran 10 miles…because it was the week of that 10 mile run I was talking about. I counted 2 of those as my walk, and called the rest 8 miles of cardio.
* My current plan for Chaos is to run this program for at least 3 weeks, as that fits my dietary schedule. Once that’s done, I’m looking at taking on the Feast Routine, and will carry forward some lessons learned for diet. And with that, why don’t we start discussing some theories and ideas? That’ll be the next post.
SUMMARY
* In order to heal/recover from Super Squats, I had to undo Super Squats. I’ve written about this regarding duality and periodization. Since Super Squats was 1 big set of a lot of reps, I looked for a program that was many sets of few reps. Super Squats had me squatting 3x a week, so I needed a program that was 1x a week. Super Squats was heavy on core lifts, so I needed something with a heavy focus on assistance. I also had a 10 mile run to prep for, so I needed something that was focused on getting me fit. 5/3/1 Krypteia fit the bill, and suited my nutritional overhaul as well.
* Alongside the programming, I also changed up what implements I was using for squatting and deadlifting. Super Squats was laser focused, so I needed to be all over the place. Balance.
* I had no issue with 5/3/1 Krypteia and I think it’s a solid protocol, but upon reading Jamie Lewis’ “Feast, Famine and Ferocity Diet” e-book, I pivoted, and that’s where I’m currently at, with plans for the future.
This is going to be a large undertaking and I may end up writing it in a few different parts as a result, but since its my blog I get to write what I want, and this is what I want to write about right now. People that follow my training log already know what’s going on, but to catch you up: after I ran Super Squats for a third time in my life (with my second time resulting in me tearing my hamstring after contracting RSV, then taking 6 weeks to run a higher intensity program wherein I tore my lat/tricep, then another 6 weeks of Super Squats capping out with a 20x405 squat, crippling elbow pain, a swollen right knee and hip and a pinched nerve in my back that took another 6 weeks to heal), I was in desperate need to do something different. Alongside my various physical ailments that came with effectively tearing my body apart every time I trained and then eating as much as possible to put it back together: I was dealing with the fallout that came WITH eating that way. I had forgone the recommended gallon of milk a day with Super Squats because it wasn’t nutritional behavior I wanted to model for my kid, but, in turn, I was ALWAYS EATING. The sheer volume of food necessary to support the training was absurd, and my whole life revolved around food. Buying it from 4 different grocery stores/online, bringing it all home, cooking it, storing it, eating it, cleaning up after it, and passing it through my system: I had no time for anything else.
Change was needed.
Something more than just switching from regular to chocolate
VELOCITY DIET/APEX PREDATOR DIET INTERVENTION
High velocity apex predator you say?
Ever since I read “Never Let Go” by Dan John, I’d been interested in “The Velocity Diet”. A super quick overview of that is: a 28 day fat loss diet comprised of protein shakes and fish oil capsules and that’s it. I dug the idea behind this protocol because it sounds like something I would do: intense and ridiculous. BUT, as a parent and husband, the idea of spending a full month NOT sharing meals with my family was a non-starter. That time is precious, and they already deal with enough of my insanity on the daily. I try to minimize my burden by training before they wake up and committing my nutritional deviance away from them while I’m at work…which is why, when an updated version of the Velocity Diet was released that included a daily “Healthy Solid Meal”, things became a LOT more viable.
Alongside that, readers of the blog know that I’ve reviewed Jamie Lewis’ (of Chaos and Pain/Plague of Strength fame/infamy) “Issuance of Insanity 3” wherein he lays out the details of his “Apex Predator diet”, which, itself, was based around the OG Velocity diet and given Jamie’s personal spin. Rather than being specifically a fat loss diet, Jamie’s approach was more modular, and could be adapted for a variety of goals. In turn, his approach allowed for up to TWO solid meals a day alongside a battery of shakes.
I relate too well to this
And herein I re-discovered something that has been pretty successful for me in the past: have TWO. Here, it’s two diets, but it also works with two training protocols. By having at least two options, I double my chance of success, because if I fail to meet ONE protocol I can still work to achieve the other. In that regard, I went on what I deemed my “family man Velocity/Apex Predator Diet”, as I was taking the two diets and mashing them together to meet my needs. If I “failed” on the Velocity Diet by having “too many” healthy solid meals in a day, it meant that I could still meet the Apex Predator diet’s protocol. And if I “failed” on Apex by having too many carbs in a meal, it could STILL be a “healthy solid meal” ala the Velocity Diet.
I will now lay out in greater detail the specifics of my deviance, alongside observations and lessons learned.
A TALE OF TWO DIETS
If only...
* Breakfast with my kid every morning is precious, and I still wanted to sit down and EAT with my kid vs drink a shake with them. There was a “cool tips” section on the Velocity Diet that talked about mixing in just a small amount of water to make a pudding out of the powder. I was able to accomplish a similar feat making “oatmeal” by taking a tablespoon of riced cauliflower, nuking it in the microwave for 55 seconds and then mixing 2 scoops of protein powder and a trickle of water. Stirring the water in slowly would create a paste-like texture which answered the mail completely. I’d throw in some cinnamon and salt and the charade would be complete. With that, I already had ONE meal solved and still complied with the intent of shakes for my meals.
* Alongside that, the Velocity Diet is 4 shakes a day: breakfast, lunch, midday and bedtime. I get up between 0300-0400 to train, and if I have my “breakfast shake” then…I’m not gonna have it when it’s time to have breakfast with my kid. Alongside that, if I push it off and DO have breakfast with my kid, that’s still like 0600. It’s a LONG time between breakfast and lunch then, and I’m “post training”, so I’m wanting protein. A few solutions: I move the midday shake to a mid-morning shake, as I found that I was really forcing the midday shake down anyway with a lack of appetite while I was RAVENOUS come mid-morning. But the other solution I took was to steal from Apex Predator and have a shake in the middle of the night when I’d get up to pee (which I could rely on, since I was stupidly hydrated through this process). This would just be a 1 scoop shake, but it meant I wasn’t training fasted and ALSO allowed me to speed up my pre-training ritual in the morning by being able to just roll out of bed and get after it.
Pretty much that
* Jamie recommends some sort of multivitamin to cover nutritional basis during the Apex Predator Diet alongside Omega 3 supplementation, which the Velocity Diet cover through use of “Superfood” and “Flameout”, which is what I used. It honestly IS reassuring to use those products. When I have a more diverse diet, I don’t ever sweat vitamins, but now that I’ve almost entirely phased out vegetables, nor am I getting in my whole eggs all that often, the inclusion of these supplements allows to push on without worry. Also, Dan John, Jon Andersen, Jamie Lewis and Chris Shuggart are all onboard with sugar free Metamucil too. That helps a lot.
* On my “normal” work weeks, I’d have midday meals on Tues, Wed and Fri. Those are the days I could meet my wife for lunch. I’d make this meal an Apex Predator style “meat on the bone” meal: typically chicken drumsticks. Dinner that evening would be a leaner meat and trace veggies (running opposite of Jamie’s suggestion of a leaner midday meal and meat on the bone in the evening). Mon and Fri was typically 1 solid meal a day, more akin to the Velocity Diet, and when possible I’d try to make it meat on the bone, but otherwise it’d be a lean meat and veggie meal. Some weeks, I managed to get in the Protein Sparing Modified Fast ala Apex Predator or a Velocity Diet 1.0 day of pure shakes (same thing basically) 1 day a week.
I mean, the precedent is there (man, lotta Simpsons on this one)
* Weekends were where the “family man” aspect shone through, but ALSO where Apex Predator really helped make this all work. Jamie has a “Rampage day” and a “High calorie keto day” in his diet. The Rampage day is a basically the reverse of the entire diet: moderate carbs meals through the day followed by a 3 hour “rampage” window that is a lot of carbs and calories to top off glycogen stores and reload for the rest of the week, alongside cycling calories in the diet to keep the metabolism humming. For me, this meant a social meal with the family on the weekend where we got to eat some fun food, alongside solid meals through the day. I’d have shakes for snacks, but that’s about it. The high calorie keto day would be my other day of that weekend: a meat and egg heavy breakfast and then meat centered meals for the rest. These were days where I was with my family all day, which meant having meals with them the whole time, and these two days were perfect for that. Jamie prefers these two days to NOT be run right next to each other, but Chaos remains the plain. I was absolutely still getting results from this. However, those Rampage days definitely did a number on me: I am so NOT carb adjusted that a little bit goes a LONG way. Spent a lot of weekends sweating profusely from the insulin shock and trying my absolute hardest not to slip into a coma.
* Because my carbs are so low, I had to start adding salt to all of my protein shakes. Low-carb dudes know this exact problem: your body is bad at holding water and balancing electrolytes without carbs. On the plus side, the salt actually enhanced the sweetness of the shakes, which is a baking trick.
EXPERIENCES, OBSERVATIONS AND LESSONS LEARNED
Sorry to let you down Stan!
* I have become stupidly lean, and fat loss wasn’t even the goal. I dropped 11lbs of bodyweight in the first 26 days of NOT supergreat compliance, as the second week of the protocol I had family in town and spend 5 consecutive days eating 3 solid meals a day on top of the shakes. I’ve stayed on the protocol for even longer, currently in my 6th week of the protocol, with no real intention of stopping. This is less a “diet” and more a lifestyle.
* I’m experiencing ZERO performance degrades with this approach. Now, sure: I’m not running Super Squats off of it, and if I were to try to take on a hypertrophy block I’d have to do some tinkering (more on that later), but I’ve been seeing weights go up in the gym while bodyfat goes down, I ran a 10 mile race with minimal prep (a 5 mile run 2 weeks out and a 5 mile run 1 week out, preceded by 50 weeks of no running), and I do not feel beat down or fatigued. This has also taught me just how little I “need” to perform. I used to have a HUGE meal before bed every night…
Big omelet, cottage cheese, veggies, meat, lotta nut butters on celery, toast, and other keto junk
*…thinking that I “NEEDED” that food to help me sleep through the night AND have fuel to train off of in the morning. These days, I’m eating 2 scoops of protein powder in an oatmeal before bed, having my “wake and shake” in the middle of the night, sleeping well and training hard first thing in the morning.
* This approach totally gels with my “no counting calories” approach. There’s no thinking nor is there any doubt: drink the shakes dummy! I KNOW I’m getting enough protein to spare my muscles and I know fat loss is going to happen unless I eat the STUPIDEST HSM possible, at which point I’ve most likely dropped the “H” from it. It’s really just “set and forget”, which clears up a LOT of mental bandwidth. That was the big goal OF this undertaking: I needed food to STOP consuming my life, and this totally did that. I have to think about ONE meal a day, and when I co-opt Jamie’s approach even THAT meal is simple. “What are we eating today? 4-6 protein shakes and chicken drumsticks.” One week, my wife was away on business, and I had no issue making my kid “to order” dinners while I just batch made a BUNCH of chicken drumsticks and had them every night. It was the simplest week ever.
"Meal prep" really doesn't get easier
* “Packing” for work is just so much simpler now. I used to have to bring a cooler FULL of food, which I’d pack every morning, and it’d eat into so much of my morning time. Now, I’ll throw a bag of protein powder in a bag, bring that to work, and it makes up the majority of my meals through the week. When the bag runs out, I bring another. I make sure to have my other supplements, and a few times a week I pack a solid lunch…but that’s it. Once again: less bandwidth. I also GET to work much earlier now, because I don’t have to spent 30 minutes cooking and cleaning up breakfast. It ALSO means I get MORE time to train, because, again, it’s time I don’t have to spend on food. To say nothing of the time I save SHOPPING for the food. Which, from the “family man” perspective, is a huge win. I have SO much more time with my family now. THAT has been one of the biggest draws to this overhaul, and why I have no real plans to change course.
* My digestion is the best it’s been in YEARS. Introducing Metamucil to my life was huge in the first place, but the sheer volume of food I was eating was just tearing up my guts something fierce. A primarily liquid based diet with 1-2 solid meals a day is SO much more manageable, and, once again, it means less time spent voiding the food. Wins all around.
* My relationship with food is ALSO substantially repaired. I’m no longer food obsessive, because the majority of the nutrition is already decided. And when you only eat 1-2 meals a day, you learn to APPRECIATE those meals. Food tastes and smells delicious and is absolutely enjoyable. I need no artificial sweeteners or science fiction/Frankenfoods: REAL food is a treat. I had so much “keto junk” in my diet: keto bread, keto wraps, keto syrups, keto cookies, etc etc. It’s all just re-branded junk. Now, I get such limited opportunities to have food that WHY would I waste it on that junk when I can have some REAL eggs, some avocado, some real meat, etc? Even my Rampage meals tend to be just hearty real food. A decade ago I was doing low carb all week with 1 weekly cheat meal, and it was always a fast food binge. And “binge” is the right word: I would eat as FAST as possible so I could eat as MUCH as possible. That is NOT healthy in SO many ways. Now, I savor my food, enjoy the taste, and enjoy the company. I’m enjoying the EXPERIENCE of food: I’m re-discovering humanity. I’m also NOT afraid of those things that I can find in nature. My LDL scare a while back had me TOTALLY dietary fat phobic, with animal fats in particular triggering some serious anxiety. Now, I’m not going to let cheese or chicken fat get in my head, because I’m not LIVING off of that: it’s my 1-2 meals a day. Knowing that nutrition is “on point” so much means that any deviation isn’t even worth worrying about.
A "healthy solid meal"
A "Rampage" meal, that is still pretty darn healthy
* Alongside that, I’m trying out things I had previously written off in my life. I used to lean primarily on diet soda for my caffeine source, having not cared for coffee. Now, plain ol’ black coffee is fantastic, which is great, because Jamie wants you to put away a lot of caffeine for Apex Predator and this makes it easy to comply. And I’m pretty happy to not be putting away a bunch of chemicals from drinking a gallon of diet coke a day.
As predicted: this grew HUGE and I haven’t even scratched the surface of how I’ve changed up my training or my random spitballing and theories to follow. I’ll write that section in a bit and release these in pieces so they’re a bit more digestible (hah! Nutrition pun), but allow me to throw in a quick summary.
SUMMARY AND TAKEAWAYS
No you idiot! We were so close!
* Eating to sustain 2 rounds of Super Squats forced me to seek a change, and in order to satisfy my desire to take on challenges, I leaned toward the Velocity Diet/Apex Predator Diet.
* Having TWO diets to follow allowed me to have more ways to succeed rather than more ways to fail. It also allowed me to meet my goals of making this approach fit in while prioritizing my family.
* Some might theorize that a diet of primarily protein shakes with 1-2 solid food meals a day would create a damaged food relationship/body, but it did the opposite. The food I get, I value, my body is performing well, and I have more time with the family and less time obsessing over food. This is also a great fit for non-calorie counters, and, in turn, if you find yourself obsessing in THAT regard, it might be worth trying that way too.
Readers,
I’ve once again taken off on a wild tear tilting at windmills with a new
protocol and program.After reading
Jamie Lewis’ “The Feast, Famine and Ferocity Diet” ebook (which is absolutely
fantastic, along with the bundle he’s currently selling at plagueofstrength.com),
I was all too ready to take on the “Famine” training protocol, and am currently
midway through the first week.Jamie has
actually given me permission to do full uploads of the workouts on my youtube,
so feel free to check them out to get an idea of what the lifting looks
like.And part of the reason I took on
this training program was because I was already in the process of following
Jamie’s “Apex Predator” diet, itself a variation of the T-nation/Biotest
“Velocity Diet”, which, in turn, is very close to the nutritional protocol
advocated IN the “famine” phase, so it was a pretty easy switch.I’ve been logging all of this in my various
logging locations, and perhaps it’s the copious amounts of caffeine I’m
consuming alongside this protocol, per the recommendations (I’ve re-discovered
black coffee, but this time ALSO discovered a love for it), but I’m genuinely
excited to eat and train again, which is something that typically only occurs
when I have a competition on the horizon.But, in turn, upon looking deeper, I realize that this has occurred
other times in my training history: when I began “Building the Monolith”, when
I began “Deep Water”, when I took on my own 6-month gaining block, and each and
every time I ran Super Squats.And, in
turn, I’ve identified the common variable: before starting all of these
protocols, I was scared of them.
This is scary for all sorts of reasons
In
disclosing that, I need to one again re-iterate that I am in fact human.All too human.It’s too easy for people to write me off as a
machine, or insane, or a bit of both (Futurama proved that they do exist), but
the truth is, when you prick me, I do in fact bleed.The only difference between me and “normal”
people is simply WHERE my limit is, but I DO have limits just like everyone
else.In turn, I will read a training or
nutritional protocol on occasion and immediately say “Oh f**k that”.That is fear.That is my mind taping out and saying “No”.It absolutely happened the first time I read
the Deep Water e-book and got the program and saw the 10x10 squats that had a
reduced rest time over 6 weeks.It
happened when I read Randall Strossen suggest drinking a gallon of milk to
survive Super Squats, or Jim Wendler suggest a dozen eggs and 1.5lbs of ground
beef.I actually BOUGHT the Deep Water
e-book and had it in my kindle for a full year before I ever ran the
program…because what happens is, I say “f—k that”, put the book away…and then
it gets inside my head…
…and I begin
to think “…well HOW could I make that work?”For Building the Monolith, it was “HOW could I do that in an hour?”For Deep Water, it was “What day could I put
the 10x10 squats so I could get it done?”For Super Squats, it was “how much milk will the college dinning hall
let me take home?”and then 15 years
later “How much FOOD will I need to eat if I won’t drink the milk?”THIS, in turn, is the facing OF these
fears.It’s my own personal “exposure
therapy”, where in my own headspace I manufacture the necessary degree of
safety in order to encounter these fears.I create control of the variables that I CAN control so that I can
assert myself over these things that generate fear, which, in turn, allows me
to encounter, face them, and eventually conquer them.And, in turn, that’s what allows me to have a
greater threshold limit than most: I’ve simply DONE this more.I’ve been around longer.Like an RPG: I’ve been grinding, so I’ve
leveled up, but we’re all still the same character class.
I am absolutely a level 100 Magikarp
But all
these programs I’ve mentioned are ALSO the ones that I credit with creating the
MOST profound physical transformations in me.Much like my most recent post on doing what you’re bad at to get big and
what you’re good at to get strong: doing these things I was afraid of triggered
a necessary growth response, whereas doing the things that looked like they’d
be “fun” or “easy” were the things I did when I needed a break.And this, of course, speaks to the consistent
recurring them I keep noting, the “will to power”, and how, in order for the
body to grow, it has to be subjected to a stimulus that tells it “if we do not
adapt, we will die”.The body MUST be
afraid of the current environment in order to be triggered into changing, for
absent such fear, it will have no motivation or catalyst for change.
Which is
“the rub” when it comes to this pursuit of physical transformation: we must
seek out exactly what which we fear in order to grow.And no: this is NOT masochism.That defeats the purpose.The masochists seeks out exactly what it is
that they want: pain.They enjoy pain, revel
in it, desire it: when they receive it, they are satisfying a want.That’s just another form of hedonism.For the masochist to grow, they would have to
intentionally seek COMFORT, as paradoxical as that seems.But for those not-afflicted, it’s a far more
straight-forward process: when you look at a training or nutritional protocol,
if you want it to create physical transformation, it should scare you.At least a little.SOMETHING about it should seem
terrifying.Some aspect of it should
seem…wrong.It should be different.
Too far
For many,
this “fear” is going to be fear of the unknown.In fact, I’ll say that for MOST that is the very fear that must be
experienced.I have known trainees that
have stalled for YEARS because they refuse to abandon their paradigm of “what
works”.The irony, of course, is lost on
them that “what works” STOPPED WORKING.The “sets of 5” acolytes that REFUSE to use any other rep range, the
“must hit each muscle twice a week” gurus that only know how to lift weights 6
days a week to train, the HIT Jedis, the bro-splitters, the camps that either
can’t figure out 5/3/1 or can’t do anything BUT 5/3/1: it’s all the same.You MUST be willing to make that jump without
the parachute in order to actually get that growth that lies beyond what you
know.You must face the fear of NOT
having a map and simply getting lost in the woods and hoping you can find our
way out.
And what’s
wild is: you face THAT fear often enough and you suddenly develop the habit of
seeking out these uncharted territories and exploring them.People will think you’re fearless, but no,
quite the opposite: you’ve become a fear JUNKIE, because you KNOW that it is
this constant exposure to and overcoming of fear that creates growth.You establish a new baseline of “bravery”
with each successive attempt, wherein it takes more and more to scare you
which, in turn, opens up avenues for even crazier methodologies that may in
fact lead to some even wilder success.
To think Milo of Croton merely LIFTED the bull...
Start small,
sure.Find something that scares you a
little…and conquer it.Then find the
next thing and conquer that.Think of
what program or protocol you’ve had in the back of your mind for a while now
and resolve to take it on.It SHOULD
scare you.
So here’s something that’s been resonating with me for a bit now, and I’m stealing from Dan John, of course, because geniuses invent and winners steal. But Dan talks about how he equates himself as a “hinge-pusher”, meaning that, in the realm of “push-pull-hinge-squat-loaded carry”, Dan primarily gravitates toward hinging and pushing. He is excellent at the Olympic lifts, the swing, the deadlift and pressing weight overhead, and he struggles with squatting and chins. And when Dan designed a program for gaining mass (Mass Made Simple), it was based around the high rep squat. Dan gives an outstanding reason for it in the Easy Strength Omnibook, regarding how the body seems able to perform high reps of squats to an almost unlimited capacity compared to deadlifts and why it’s best suited for mass gaining….but when looking at Easy Strength, there’s something else worth observing: Dan advocates AGAINST using the squat there. Here we observe my own curiosity: for getting bigger, Dan is doing the thing he’s bad at, and for getting stronger, he DOESN’T do that thing: he does what he is good at.
We all pay something don't we?
As a fellow hinger and not a squatter, I totally relate to Dan. I was able to cat-back deadlift 540lbs without a belt when I was 22, but I STRUGGLED to get my squat to 400lbs. I did the 10k swing challenge in a week as a deload, and my most recent run of Super Squats almost broke me, to say nothing of just how horrible all those squats LOOKED while I was doing them. I have no upper torso and am all limbs. I’m built to hinge and NOT built to squat. And, in turn, the programs that forced me to grow the most are the programs that have been built around squats. Whenever I dedicate time to squatting, I grow. And my longtime readers will know that I’ve even observed that focusing on the front squat in particular REALLY triggers a hypertrophy response for me: the SQUATTIEST of squats. Meanwhile, the Safety Squat Bar does NOT create this effect in me, primarily because I can absolutely hinge squat that squat and play to my strengths rather than my weaknesses. Heck, this is why I use a buffalo bar: it forces me to hold the bar slightly higher up on my back than I can with a straight bar with sharp knurling.
And since I’m such a bad squatter, it’s not something I’ll naturally pick to do, which means programs that make me do a LOT of squatting make me grow, because, again, I’m bad at it. Super Squats might be “just 20 reps”, but, of course, they’re 20 HARD reps, and they’re done 3 times a week, so now we’re looking at 60 reps in a week, and 120 in 2 weeks. Deep Water is obvious in just how much squatting you do with it being 10x10, and even though the frequency of it is once every 2 weeks…it’s a LOT of squatting. I hate it, it’s not what I’m good at…and it makes me grow.
Also true
Know how I squat when I wanna get strong? Zeno squats. I’ve written about that before, but for the unfamiliar: Zeno Squats are named after Zeno of Elea, who had a paradox of motion that described how motion was impossible, because for an arrow to travel from point to point, it must first travel half the distance between those two points, and to get there it must first travel half the distance between THOSE two points, etc etc, going on forever, proving the arrow could never move in the first place. I made it cute by taking a weight I could squat for 8 reps, doing it for 6, racking the bar, taking 12 deep breaths, then doing 3 reps, rack, breathe, 2 reps (half rounding up), rack, breathe, 1 rep, strip weight off, repeat until death. I do Zeno squats ONCE a week, and when it’s all said and done, I’m looking at something along the lines of 24 reps at the first week. The next week, I add ONE rep to that first set and let the waterfall effect occur, but even still, it takes SEVERAL weeks before I accumulate any meaningful volume on the lift, but my strength goes up leaps and bounds whenever I do it…and I don’t ever grow particularly big from it.
A similar effect when it comes to deadlifts: my most effective deadlift strength protocol has been ROM progression deads. There, I don’t even pull a full ROM deadlift until week 7, and leading up to that we’re looking at a total of 15-25 reps a week on the pull. Stupid low volume, doesn’t make me grow, DOES make me strong…and it’s what I’m GOOD at.
Some of us are just gifted
And, in turn, this is ALSO why, when I want to grow, I follow someone ELSE’s program. Primarily because someone else is going to make me do something I don’t want to do. And when I want to get stronger, I do my OWN programming, because I know what I’m good at, and it’s what I’ll do. Every strongman competition and powerlifting meet I’ve won, I’ve done so with my own programming. When trying to use someone else’s, I fell flat. Meanwhile, whenever I’ve tried to design a “hypertrophy program”, it was a bust. Yes, I’ve co-opted lessons learned into other programs to modify them, but ultimately the base and foundation had to come from outside in order to me to actually grow.
Continuing on this theory, here’s my thought: the body grows muscle as a necessary adaptation to a threat to its existence. The body does not like to change, and will only do so if the consequence of NOT changing is more significant than the consequence of changing. When the body feels that its very safety is in jeopardy unless it changes: it will change. In turn, we must subject it to a consistent dosage of what it is BAD at in order for it to create that catalyst for change. The body will encounter the dissonance inherent in constantly attempting to perform a task it is poorly suited for and will continue trying to force some sort of adaptation in the hopes of remedying this situation. And we use this knowledge to our advantage: we find what our body is weak at and we play to our weaknesses. It’s downright cruel.
"This never would've happened to Samson!"
The above is an example of SURVIVAL. The body is doing the things it needs in order to survive. The opposite of surviving is THRIVING, and when we thrive, the body no longer is attempting to adapt but, instead, it settles in and fully realizes itself. When the body wants to survive, it enters a state of “fight or flight”, and it does some pretty cool things from a biological perspective to maximize our chances of survival in that instance. Digestion shuts down, pupils get smaller, cortisol raises, etc etc. All cool things from a survival standpoint…and absolutely terrible and destructive in the long term. Looking at people that have SURVIVED harsh, prolonged experiences (like POWs) demonstrates just how capable the body is at adapting to prolonged survival AND how destructive it can be. Without even meaning to, I’ve just brought up the value of periodization in training, but my real intention here was to demonstrate the differing biological processes the body undergoes when it’s allowed to SURVIVE rather than thrive. But let’s talk to that now.
A body that is thriving is geared toward consistent self-improvement and self-actualization. We go to Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs there. The body wants security, food, shelter, etc etc, and once it has all of that, it gets to start thriving. When we transition the body AWAY from the things it’s bad at and allow it to consistently perform the things it is GOOD at, it responds by getting better and better at what it is good at. It’s not adapting: it’s THRIVING. This is why these gains can be reached in a caloric deficit: the body is in such a natural state of excellence that it no longer requires excessive fuel to perform its functions, but can instead “effortlessly” execute its mission. It responds to being tasked with its strengths by getting stronger.
I still think Juggernaut is cooler though
The common wisdom is to ALWAYS do the things you’re bad at so that you have no weaknesses, but I feel like this speaks to the duality of needing time to play to your strengths and time to shore up your weaknesses. Someone that ONLY brings their weaknesses up to their strengths is simply mediocre. We can always make our strengths equal our weaknesses by making our strengths weaker…but that’s silly. When I ruptured my ACL, I trained my other leg as hard as I could, and people asked me if I was worried about imbalances, to which I said “I’d rather have one strong leg than two weak ones”. So know what you’re good at and what you’re bad at so that you can know when to train which!
I took exactly 1 class of psychology in my undergrad (which would be, of course, psych 101) and learned enough to know that the human mind is fascinating and I am well out of my depth trying to discuss it, so anyone who actually knows anything about the subject: forgive my cultural appropriatism here, but I’m going to talk about the Rorschach test. For those unfamiliar, this test, also known as the “ink-blot” test, involved showing the patient a series of ink blots, asking them the first thing that came to their mind upon seeing them, and using their responses as a method of psychological evaluation. I’m not going to pretend to understand the nuances of such a process, but if I show one person an ink-blot and that person says “ice cream” and the second person says “arson”, I’m watching that second person a little closer. But even without the requisite education in psychology, we can learn from this test, primarily in the sense that YOUR first response when presented with an idea can be quite informing of how YOU perceive the world.
Check it out: philosophy, psychology AND chaos all in one shot...and a corndog!
Case in point? Hard training. Boom: what did you think? It’s so amazing how, when I say “hard training”, trainees either stare blankly at me, or ask if I mean “train 6 days a week” or “take every set to failure”. Right away, your initial response is telling ME that you don’t know how to train hard. Because, right away, you’re trying to make “hard training” a mechanical process rather than a human one. You’re trying to set up the parameters OF the training the CREATE hard training, and that’s an artificial construct that simply will not gel with the humanity element at play when we discuss training. Hard training is training wherein you pour every fiber of your being INTO the training. “Every set to failure” doesn’t mean that, because I’ve seen how some of you cats “fail” a lift: you had at LEAST 6 more reps in you if you were actually willing to push through the pain. To say nothing of how, whenever someone says they take “every set to failure”, I know I’ve found a liar. You mean to tell me that, on 3 sets of squats, for every set, you let the bar crash into the pins, unload all the plates, rack the bar, re-load all the plates, and then do that again for the next set? No: stop. And train 6 days a week? How do I know you’re not training hard? You can do it SIX DAYS A WEEK. By the end of Super Squats, I was good for ONE hard workout that week. But I get people REAL mad when I say this, so let’s move on to nutrition to further alienate my readers.
Ah yes, nutrition. Did your mind immediately jump to supplements? Did you think protein powder, weightgainer and creatine? Notice how these are SUPPLEMENTS? They’re supposed to augment what is missing from your diet. What FOOD are you eating? When you read “food”, did you think “Uber Eats?” McDonalds? Did you think frozen dinners? Did you think of 1500 calorie shakes? Did you think of ANYTHING that requires actual cooking? Have you thought of a single vegetable yet? It baffles me how much time and energy we invest in trying to get trainees to eat like a human. Cooking doesn’t need to be a 4 hour affair: it can be done quickly, efficiently and effectively, especially with all the modern amenities available these days. And with the impact of inflation as of the time I’m writing this, there’s no way you can tell me that eating out is cheaper than making something at home. Nor is it faster. And this is the stuff you are putting IN YOUR BODY to achieve physical transformation. Why WOULDN’T you pick stuff that is the closest to real, human food as possible? Why would you want to transform off of something with an ingredient list that reads like a chemistry paper?
Oh f**k me: just make a grilled cheese sandwich
And that’s just “food”. Now what if I say “eating”? Right away, the calorie and macro calculators come out. You go about this whole process backwards. You decide you’re going to eat a certain amount of stuff and that THIS is going to transform you. The body transforms from demands placed upon it: that’s TRAINING. That’s the HARD training we just talked about. The body doesn’t transform from fuel: the fuel FUELS the transformation. It doesn’t matter if I put premium fuel or canola oil in my truck, nor does it matter if I put in 1 gallon or 50 if I never TURN IT ON. It’s the same with eating: the eating is there to FUEL the transformation process: not vector it. When I think “eating”, I think “to recover”. I just did my write-up of Super Squats and I wrote about how there was literally not a moment of the day I wasn’t eating, because I was CONSTANTLY recovering from the training. As of this moment, I’m in a deload. I’m focusing on running and bodyweight work. I am going hours between meals, and the meals themselves are sparse. My recovery demand is low. Yes: I will lose fat as a result of this. No: this is not a fat loss phase of training. The training is light because it is necessary to have a lighter training phase after such an INTENSE phase of training. Oh my goodness, periodization once again. Let training drive the bus here and you’ll be good: do it backwards and…well…you go backwards.
You can keep going on these tests. When you hear “strength”, do you think total on the big 3? Or do you think “ability to impose will”? Or heck, do you hear strength and think “size”? When you hear hypertrophy, do you think “bodybuilding”, or do you think “accumulation?” When you hear “strongman training”, do you think anything, or do you come back with “for WHAT competition?” You don’t need to be a psychologist to be able to appreciate what these tests reveal to ourselves. We may end up learning more than we thought we knew.
I owe the
topic title to u/CommonKings over on reddit, who is an absolute psychopath
regrading all matters of training and is absolutely on my kickball team for
Ragnarok (dude ran a version of Deep Water where he STARTED at 2 minutes rest
and went down from there, f--k me).Predictably, I was slumming it on the internet and came across a
(hopefully) young trainee that was wanting to know if they could make use of
Milk Duds (a confection of chocolate coated caramel, wherein 3 of the first 4
ingredients are simply different ways to say sugar [corn syrup, sugar, and
dextrose] and the “milk” finally shows up as skim milk on ingredient 5) as a
means of achieving their goal of physical transformation.They assured us all that they would, of
course, be following a diet that hit ALL the necessary macro AND micro
nutrients: the Milk Duds were simply going to be utilized as a “necessary evil”
in order to achieve their caloric goal of the day to promote muscular
growth.What a dandy idea: candy for
gains!To which I asked the eponymous
topic title: “do you want the kind of body that was built by Milk Duds?”
At least go with the Peanut M&M... for the protein
I’m gonna go
full Aristotle here folks: your body is a reflection of your habits.There is no greater truth teller than your
physical appearance.Now, I’m not going
to go full Greek here to present the idea that beautiful people are more
virtuous than ugly people, because we can only get so jacked but no one can fix
our face, but as far as what our BODY presents: it’s telling ALL of our
secrets.There is no hiding behind a
screen or an alias or some e-stats: our body presents to the world a sum of our
habits.And that’s the thing: it’s
HABITS.It’s the things we’re ALWAYS
doing that the body shares with the world.If you absolutely crushed your last workout, and the 24 workouts prior
to that were phoned in, your body is going to display those 24 workouts, not
your last one.And expand that out to
the micro level: if the ONLY physical greatness you achieve daily is a 1-2 hour
workout, and you spend the next 22 hours being a slob, what do you imagine your
body will present?
This is such
common sense thing that NO ONE wants to acknowledge because it’s “unfair”, but
your body doesn’t care about fair: it shares your secrets with the world.This is “being that which does”.A body that constants experience toil,
suffering, and overcoming is going to outwardly reflect a being that suffers,
toils and overcomes…and those beings are physically awesome.A body that constantly experiences leisure,
comfort, and pleasure is going to reflect a being of leisure, comfort and
pleasure.From there, it’s a question of
ratios: the greater the time spent overcoming, the more the body reflects an
overcomer.And, for those of us pursuing
physical transformation, we seek to be an overcomer.
The body, seen here, overcoming
Your “body
by Milk Duds” is not the body of an overcomer.It is the body of a schemer.Of a
trickster.Of someone who relies on
guile vs brutality to resolve a difficulty.I am sure your cranium will enlarge to accommodate your big brain that
came up with this foolproof plan to almost quite literally “have your cake and
eat it”, but your body will reflect that OF a cake-eater vs an overcomer.Just from a very basic common sense
perspective I ask you the question “do you want the kind of body that was built
by Milk Duds?”I ask this question and
it upsets you because you don’t WANT the answer to be “no”, but we already know
that, by asking for the permission to do it in the first place, we KNEW it
wasn’t right: we just hoped we were wrong about BEING wrong.
“But Dave
Tate lived off of Oreos and Little Debbies when he was in his prime!”And what did Dave eat ON THE WAY to those
confectionary treats?Have you, gentle
reader, gained up to 275lbs of bodyweight on chicken, rice and broccoli before
you finally hit a gastrointestinal wall that necessitated having to overcome
THROUGH comfort?Can you imagine the
sort of twisted Faustian deal wherein one must actually force the intake of the
very foods people consider “treats” because they are so nutritionally dense
that they can finally bridge the gap necessary to create FURTHER growth in the
pursuit of physical transformation?To
have to totally warp your own reality such that the very thing that people use
to experience transient dopamine-releasing joy through simulation of simple
pleasure centers is instead utilized as a tool to create even further
discomfort, agony and toil in the pursuit of physical transformation?The cenobites couldn’t devise such
insanity…and, meanwhile, Dave would be the first to tell you that he looked
physically awful during that time as well, because the body will STILL tell all
of our secrets: we’re eating more candy than we’re not eating.Yeah, we may be squatting 900lbs and benching
600…but we are still candy eaters.
Shirtless, not to show off physique, but because you're ALWAYS sweating when you're this big
BUT, the
tyranny and cruelty of the body can absolutely be played against itself,
because it is nothing but transparent in its evil.We know EXACTLY what the body is going to do:
it’s going to share our secrets with the world.In turn, all WE need to do is control the secrets.If we do not create gossip, if we live on the
straight and narrow, if we exist AS overcomers, the body will have no choice
but to share THAT secret.Do you realize
how empowering it is to have so predictable of an enemy?To know, before the battle starts, EXACTLY
what they are going to do?This is
playing rock-paper-scissors with Bart Simpson: I can lament the fact that I can
never play scissors, OR I can celebrate the fact that victory is assured
because my opponent ALWAYS chooses rock and I merely need to pick paper.
All we need
to do to succeed is have boring secrets to share.When we are consistently overcoming, in the
realm of training and nutrition, we will have a body built by overcoming.When are consistently eating Milk Duds, we
will have a body build by Milk Duds.Which one do you want?
