This is
going to get a little philosophical so bear with me.
Did somebody say philosophy bear?!
Did somebody say philosophy bear?!
Many
philosophers have argued about the nature of reality. Some posited that we have no way of knowing
if what we experience is even real, or if in fact everything is an illusion and
we’re all just brains in jars being given artificial senses (and, consequently,
someone ended up making “The Matrix”).
Others argue that there IS a reality out there, but we’re not able to
perceive it accurately because we must utilize our senses, which results in
bias and imperfections. Others in turn
argue the possibility of many different and concurrently existing realities,
resulting in innumerable possibilities of experiences. And finally, some contend that none of this
matters anyway.
For today’s
topic, we’re going to assume that there is in fact a reality, and that you have
access to it. What we also must assume
then, is that this reality exists regardless of your perception of it. A chair will still be present even if you are
not actively looking at or thinking about the chair. This assumption becomes critical, because it
will explain why MEASURING your reality has no impact on the fact of your
reality.
Except this guy can actually get away with it
What am I
talking about? I’m talking about the
incessant need of many trainees to know their “stats”. Bodyfat percentage, 1 rep maxes in a variety
of lifts, WILKS coefficient, the “golden ratio”, etc etc, all these things are
entirely inconsequential to what IS.
Regardless of what these numbers end up being, they have zero impact on
how big and strong you are, as THAT information is the same irrespective of
being measured.
Let’s say a
trainee looks at themselves in the mirror one day and decides they like how
they look. They think they have a good
amount of definition and size, and are proud of their accomplishments. Now, this same trainee goes and gets their
bodyfat percentage measured, and it comes in a whopping 25%. Did anything change because of the
measurement? No, the trainee still looks
exactly the same as they did before, the only difference is that now they have
some sort of data point for some sort of information.
Yet,
trainees go CRAZY over this sort of stuff.
Everyday there are thousands of kids begging the internet to guess their
bodyfat percentage based off of a few poorly taken photos (don’t forget the
super aggressive overhead lighting to really create an illusion of leaness). Why?
The number doesn’t change reality: you still end up looking exactly the
same before you got the measurement.
Additionally, trusting amateurs to guess your bodyfat percentage is an
exercise in madness, as these folks have zero credentials or experience, and
love to quote numbers in the safe range like “12-15%”. What does that even mean?!
Saying you have in IQ in the 80-120 range can mean wildly different things
Saying you have in IQ in the 80-120 range can mean wildly different things
The same is
true for 1 rep maxes. Finding out your 1
rep max in no way alters how strong you are, and in most cases, due to how
stressful the maxing process is, it actually has the opposite result. Prior to establishing your 1 rep max, you had
the strength already available to move whatever weight it was that you end up
moving for your 1 rep max: all that has happened is that you have demonstrated
this strength. Unless you are in a
competition, what would be the value of this?
To know? So you can tell people
how much you lift? Here’s another fun
part about reality: you don’t get any bigger or leaner by knowing how much you
can lift for 1 rep, nor will you appear any bigger or leaner by relaying this
information to someone. Once again, it
is merely a data point, and of no impact to reality.
Our senses
may be imperfect, but they are the only tools available to us to experience
reality in whatever form it takes.
However you look, that is how you look, regardless of what the scale or
calipers say. However strong you are,
that is how strong you are, regardless of whatever you lifted in order to prove
it. If you keep training hard and eating
well, you will alter how others perceive you because you will alter YOURSELF,
and in doing so none of the data points will matter.
Or, of
course, there is always nihilism.
I always laugh at how you vacillate between nihilism and stoicism. The line is so close.
ReplyDeleteAs a Nietzsche fan, I must lament how much I am letting him down, haha.
DeleteI like this post. It reminds me that I should catalog my workouts to know where I need to go from where I am, and not necessarily to know where I am.
ReplyDelete