Saturday, August 8, 2026

THE ROULETTE DIET: DON’T GAMBLE ON YOUR NUTRITION

 

As I continue to navigate the nutritional space and pick up bits and pieces along the way, I continue to refine my own approach and implement lessons learned to further perpetuate success.  That’s what I have done most recently in my current phase of training, focusing on leaning out and improving insulin sensitivity while prioritizing maintaining muscle and strength in preparation for a strongman competition.  I’ve dropped 4 kilograms (8.8lbs) of bodyweight in 9.5 weeks, and during such time my front squat has increased from 2x315 to 2x325 and my log clean and press has gone up from 3x200 to 3x215 and 1x220.  I’ve also observed steady increases in my ability to load the stone of steel and power keg, I’ve increased daily chins/dips, and improved my ability on prowler sprints, so just general physical improvements across the board WHILE dropping bodyweight and getting leaner WITHOUT experiencing hunger.  This is a winning combination, because it ensures continued perpetual compliance/sustainability, which are the keys to successful nutritional protocols.  So let’s explore what I am now referring to as “The Roulette Diet”: because everything needs a catchy name.

 

WHY THE NAME “ROULETTE DIET”?


Because "The Craps Diet" sounds more like something for IBS



The name derives from the colors on a roulette wheel: red, black, and green.  That’s because this is a further refinement of what I previously wrote as the “Red Meat/Black Coffee” diet, specifically because I realized that the name was ignoring the “Green” portion of the diet which, though it occurred less frequently than the red and black portions, was STILL a crucial part of the whole process. 

 

WHAT ARE THE COLORS?


Thankfully it's a bit more streamlined than this



Simple enough:

·       Red=Red Meat

·       Black=Black Coffee

·       Green=Meal with carbohydrate

If it makes it even easier, you can think of Green to mean “Greens” to represent a meal where you eat plants, but it’s not restricted to JUST “greens”: all plants are on the table (to include honey).

 

SELLING POINTS


Just when you thought I couldn't get any dumber...



·       No calorie/macro tracking/counting.

·       No hunger.

·       Continued athletic performance improvement.

·       Ability to include all foods (still no alcohol).

 

WHAT TOOLS ARE BEING USED?


And are they being used correctly?



·       Intermittent fasting: 1-2 meals a day, no snacks.

·       “Carnivore Diet”: Elimination diet with no plants consumed, emphasis on ruminant animals/red meat.

·       Ketosis: Low carbohydrate intake, fat and protein modular based on needs.

·       Cyclical Ketogenic Diet: Introduction of a carbohydrate meal to intentionally break/re-start ketosis.  Promotes metabolic flexibility.

·       Coffee/caffeine: Stimulants and polyphenols.

 

WHY THESE TOOLS?


Because success leaves clues...



·       Intermittent fasting:

o   Energy intake control mechanism that obviates need to monitoring/tracking intake.  By reducing the window of time one CAN eat, one typically reduces the amount that one eats.  Many Americans are the victim of a “death by 1000 cuts” nutritionally.  It’s not one big meal a day that does them in: it’s the constant snacking, nibbling, grazing, etc on hyperpalatable/non-satiating junk, before going on to engage in their ritualistic 3 meals per day irrespective of actual hunger levels (“I’m eating lunch because it’s lunchtime, even though I had a big breakfast in the morning and then 3 donuts in the breakroom at 0900”).

o   Reported benefits of improving insulin sensitivity, blood sugar, blood insulin, etc.  By reducing the frequency of eating, we reduce the frequency of blood sugar spikes and corresponding insulin response, which allows our bodies to develop insulin sensitivity.

o   Rests digestion.  For those that are coming from a period of heavy/frequent eating, reducing the frequency gives the guts a chance to rest and recover and redevelop the mucus lining.

o   Easy tool to leverage, especially for those inclined toward extremes.  You don’t need to eat less or more food at each meal: you just adjust how many days you have 1 meal vs 2 meals.

·        Carnivore diet:

o   Nutritional intervention: a carnivore diet is an “elimination diet”, which removes all processed foods (among others) from the diet, resulting in reduced systemic inflammation and the removal of any foods that could be triggering an autoimmune/histamine response.

o   With intermittent fasting driving the meal frequency, often resulting in 1 meal a day, in order to get the necessary protein intake to maintain/grow muscle, it’s necessary to emphasize protein intake.  With a carnivore approach, specifically premised around red meat, all food consumed will contain protein, and it’s possible within the realm of a single meal to reach one’s protein goal as there is no plant matter to occupy stomach space that could be allocated toward protein.  This also tends to allow one to eat to satiety without concern of overeating: it’s honestly just plain HARD to overeat ONE meal of meat and eggs, no matter how big a fan of it you are.  Because if you DO somehow manage to do so, you tend to feel so satiated from it you genuinely don’t want to eat again for quite a while.

o   High protein and high fat intake lends well to satiety, which helps perpetuate the intermittent fasting.  Intermittent fasting with a mixed diet that includes carbohydrates tends to result in a blood sugar spike, followed by a crash, which creates an “energy crisis” wherein we seek sugar to replenish energy.  This requires “white knuckling” through the fast until we FINALLY get to eat, which can result in us outeating whatever benefits we got from the fasting as far as energy restriction goes.  Keeping the nutrition carnivore results in a steady/sustainable energy level.

o   Red meat specifically emphasized due to ability of ruminant animals to better filter the toxins out of their food sources compared to monogastric animals, which tends to result in superior Omega 3/6 ratios and micronutrient profiles.  Whole eggs from pastured chickens are also acceptable for similar reasons.

·       Ketogenic diet:

o   Nutritional intervention.  Many people suffer from metabolic syndrome, often the product of a “broken carbohydrate metabolism” wherein they’ve lost the ability to effectively utilize fats as a fuel source and can ONLY burn carbs for fuel.  This, paired with low insulin sensitivity, results in overconsumption of carbs to satiate energy hunger, resulting in a negative feedback loop via the Randel Cycle.  A ketogenic diet forces the body to transition to fats as a fuel source due to the absence of carbs as a fuel source.

o   Puts the body in a state wherein it is producing ketones and relying on them as a fuel source, alongside fat (dietary and bodyfat).  This continues to perpetuate the “no hunger” angle of the diet that was started by eating in a carnivore manner.  We have FAR more stores of fat on our body than we do carbs, so putting us in a state where we’ve transitioned away from carbs as our primary fuel source allows us to rely on a sustainable fuel source that doesn’t put us in an “energy crisis” and, quite possibly, strips fat off our body.

o   This tends to be the natural outcome of complying with a carnivore diet.  Without counting/tracking macros and specifically attempting to employ a 2:1 or greater ration of fats to protein, the state of ketosis will most likely be “shallower” than an intentional ketogenic diet, but still present.

o   “Double fasting effect”: ketogenic diets are “fasting mimicking”, as is intermittent fasting, yet we’re never actually in a sustained/prolonged fast such that we deprive the body if necessary protein to sustain/build muscle

·       Cyclical Ketogenic Diet (by way of weekly carbohydrate meal):

o   Metabolic Flexibility: the ability to seamlessly transition between the fuel sources of carbohydrates and fats depending on availability.  The majority of the population is carbohydrate dependent and lost the ability to effectively metabolize fats, but we don’t want to cause the reverse issue by only knowing how to metabolize fats.  By inclusion of a cyclical ketogenic diet by way of a weekly carbohydrate meal, we allow the body to maintain it’s ability to utilize carbohydrates as a fuel source through regular controlled introduction of carbs.

o   Many individuals report issues with long term sustained ketosis/carnivore dieting in terms of hormonal health (thyroid, testosterone, cortisol, etc), electrolytes, blood glucose, etc.  If there is a concern with that, a cyclical ketogenic approach can obviate some of these issues through the inclusion of controlled carbohydrate intake to help reset levels.

o   With fasting being a stressor on the body, this break from fasting can help regulate cortisol levels, especially so given carbohydrates role in controlling cortisol.

o   Inclusion of a carbohydrate meal can help with sustainability/compliance.  There is no restriction/denial on the diet.  All foods are available: there is just a restriction insomuch as frequency is concerned.  Also promotes sustainability by allowing the diet to account for social situations.

·       Coffee:

o   During fasting periods, inclusion of coffee allows for easier compliance.  Caffeine is a known appetite suppressant, and a warm beverage is filling/satiating in and of itself.

o   Coffee has a variety of reported health benefits, to include polyphenols, a trace amount of fiber, associations with longevity, etc.

o   Allows for social elements during periods of fasting.  Can still go out for coffee with friends/peers.

o   Vehicle for electrolytes, which are necessary for athletes on restricted carbohydrate diets.

o   CAN be overdone.  Those that are caffeine sensitive should consider employment of decaf.  Also worth noting that caffeine is known to increase cortisol, which fasting does as well, so stacking them on top of each other can get a bit worrisome.

 

THE STRUCTURE: HOW IT ALL WORKS TOGETHER


Sometimes that's all the explanation we need



When you look at a roulette wheel, it’s got 18 red spaces, 18 black spaces, and 2 green.  This is a representation of frequency as it relate to when we’re having Red Meat, Black Coffee, and “Green Meals”.  It’s not 1 for 1 as far as frequency goes, as any gambler can tell you that there are some days at the table where it seems like you’re always coming up red or always coming up black, but green is definitely a rare feature.

 

·       When the goal is fat loss, 4 1-meal days and 3-2 meal days are the sweet spot.  My preference is Mon and Tues as 1 meal days, Weds (heaviest training day of the week) as 2 meal, Thurs and Fri as 1 meal, Weekend as 2 meals.  Yet again I emphasize that this is NOT “white knuckling”.  The more I fast, the more I LIKE fasting and am inclined toward it. 

 

·       If I’m trying to build muscle, I like 2 days per week with 1 meal (Tues and Thurs, non-lifting days), and the rest as 2 meal days. 

 

·       No set structure for when the meals fall.  My preference is 1 meal days have an evening meal and 2 meal days have a morning and evening meal, but there is flexibility here.  You’re eating based on HUNGER ultimately: not time.  In turn, this also means eating until I’m not hungry. 

 

·       On the above, I have found success during fat loss periods by heavily emphasizing protein compared to fats.  I specifically accomplish this by eating more egg whites and fewer whole eggs.  When I’m gaining, I like a ratio of 5 egg whites to 3 whole eggs, consumed at each meal.  During periods of fat loss, on single meal days, I’ll have 10 egg whites and 1 whole egg.  On the 2 meal days, I’ll do a 5/3 ratio for 1 meal, and 5/1 for the second.  This is consumed in ADDITION to red meat: not in place of it.

 

·       When not eating, coffee is on the menu.  I am a “caffeine non-responder”, and can drink it all day if I want to, but I still try to keep it reasonable. 

 

·       My “Green Meal” is Sunday evening.  Don’t get into the idea that this is a “cheat meal”: it’s absolutely part of the plan.  In turn, don’t turn this into a binge.  It’s not the “rampage meal” that Jamie Lewis wrote about in the Apex Predator diet: this is far more akin to the carb meal that Vince Gironda wrote about in the “Maximum Definition Diet”.  Key difference (for me) is that it’s not a PURE carbohydrate meal.  It’s a meal that INCLUDES carbs.  Fats and protein are still permittable.  For my run of this, the meal was typically pizza made on a homemade sourdough crust along with some sourdough cookies/baked goods with some raw local honey.  Do yourself a favor and make this meal a QUALITY meal rather than junkfood binge, for the sake of your guts.

 

·       Having the meal on Sunday evening allows for me to train on Monday morning and make use of consumed carbohydrates as a fuel source, which continues to promote metabolic flexibility.

 

·       It’s worth appreciating that, though I don’t consider it a meal or snack, before bed, I DO consume a 170g serving of full fat skyr or Greek yogurt mixed with 1 scoop of Metabolic Drive protein powder.  The primary function of this is a means to introduce calcium and bacteria cultures to the guts and provide some protein while I sleep/recover before my morning training session.  The full fat and minimal carbs tends to mean there’s no sugar spike while I sleep, and this is part of my nighttime sleep ritual.  I think it’s a worthwhile addition, and, if it helps with reconciling “the diet”, consider it within the “fasting window” of the evening meal and you’re set.

 

IN SUMMARY


In case the instructions were unclear, here's the infographic

The “Roulette Diet” is a combination of Intermittent Fasting and a Cyclical Ketogenic diet based around carnivore foods and black coffee.  It can be modulated to support fat loss or muscle building.  It requires no counting/tracking of calories or macros nor “white knuckling” through hunger: fasting frequency is the tool that is leveraged to account for goals. 


Saturday, August 1, 2026

OBSERVATIONS FROM EVAN PARKER’S “SUPERSHRED ME” McCARNIVORE DIET

I fell hard for some Instagram clickbait, so much so that I actually made an account so I could view the whole story (found here: https://www.instagram.com/supershredme/).  Evan Parker is a new/soon to be influencer that lost 11lbs in 30 days and significantly reduced his bodyfat eating nothing but McDonalds, in an attempt to achieve the opposite of Morgan Spurlock’s efforts in “Supersize Me”.  Specifically, Evan employed what he referred to as the “McCarnivore Diet”: a “relaxed carnivore” diet wherein he ate primarily quarter pounder patties, cheese, bacon, round eggs, sausage patties, pickles and (at the start) ice cream and small servings of bread.  Evan’s bodyweight went from 183lbs to 172, so this was not the case of a 400lb person losing some water weight, and his after photos demonstrate the presence of muscle tone, indicating that this was not an untrained individual benefitting from the novel response of training.


Ignore the subcaptions: this is an amateur before and after job done by myself

As much of a publicity stunt as this can easily be chalked up to, in watching all 30 days of this eating, I found that there were some significant takeaways from what he did that could be employed in many other attempts at nutritional intervention.  To include:

 

HE MADE IT SUSTAINABLE


I mean, the precedent is there

Evan was very adamant that this was a “relaxed carnivore” approach, and he employed this approach for multiple reasons.  Biologically, he wanted to ensure that his transition from a traditional western American diet to a carnivore approach was not so significant a shock to his system that he experienced withdraw effects, aka “the keto flu”.  Using the nutrition information provided by McDonalds, he was able to determine the intake he would need for 50g of carbs per day during the initial wave of the diet, which he then worked down to 25g, before going effectively 0g in the final 2 weeks.  And this ALSO permitted him the ability to still have “treats” like an ice cream cone and the muffins from the breakfast sandwiches, which afforded some psychological sustainability as well.

 

But along with that, he made it FINANCIALLY sustainable as well by leveraging deals afforded to him via the app, completing surveys, and employing the “ala carte” ordering options in order to create a budget that boiled down to effectively $6 per meal at 1-2 meals per day.  Living in Hawaii, Evan noted that the cost of a McDonald’s quarter pounder patty ala carte was effectively cheaper than buying 1/4lb of beef at the store.  Evan found an approach that could be repeated indefinitely without significant financial strain, AND it even came with the bonus of requiring no cooking/cleaning, so it was the ultimate in “high speed/low drag” operations.

 

And finally, despite the fact that fast food is already hyperpalatable and engineered specifically for maximum enjoyment, he made it sustainable by being able to find foods that fit within his parameters yet still afforded him variety.  This was not the “quarter pounder patty diet for 30 days”, and, instead, if you watch all 30 days, you’ll see Evan get quite creative with the limited menu afforded to him.  At one point he declares that he’s going to do JUST beef patties for the remainder of the challenge, and then quickly abandons course in order to allow cheese and bacon, which gave him what he needed to be able to make it to the end.  And Evan constantly commented about how much he enjoyed eating the food he was eating.  Compliance was easy to achieve.  I feel this speaks to another aspect that allowed him to succeed:

 

GUIDELINES AND STRUCTURE, NOT RULES


Imagine being able to get "Fight Club ripped" without Fight Club rules...


All successful diets employ some manner of restriction.  Time restriction (we only eating during certain windows), energy restriction (we only eat a certain amount of food total) or nutrient restriction (we DON’T eat 1 or 2 of the 3 macronutrients).  Evan’s approach employed all 3, but in a manner that did not FEEL like restriction.

 

Evan always kept the goal the goal here, to take from Dan John, and he operated under a series of guidelines that were intended to help him reach that goal.  These weren’t rules and laws created by a deity that he was supposed to feel guilt for if he broke them: these were simply guidelines there to keep him on track and give him a vector.  This was the “McCarnivore diet”, so if pickles showed up on occasion, it wasn’t the biggest deal. 

 

That said, the structure of the diet ALSO created some “bumpers” that helped keep Evan on track.  Though one of the pros of eating McDonalds for every meal is that you don’t have to shop for food, cook or clean, one of the cons is that you don’t have ANY food unless you go to McDonalds.  This created a necessary “barrier to entry” for Evan as it related to eating.  There was no opportunity to mindlessly snack, no sneaking off in the night to raid the fridge: if he wanted to eat, he had to go out and get it.  It’s honestly very “hunter/gatherer” meets Wall-E.  But what this ended up doing was putting Evan in a position where he only ate 1-2 meals a day, because logistically, based around his personal schedule, it was what he could facilitate.  This, in turn, necessitated another form of nutrition strategy, such that…

 

THE FOOD SELECTION ENSURED SUCCESS


Again: the precedent is there...


The reason Evan COULD sustain a 1-2 meal a day approach is BECAUSE of the foods he chose to eat with his McCarnivore diet.  Evan started with around 2400 calories per day, bumped down to around 2200, and eventually settled at around 1750.  This isn’t many calories for an active male at around 180lbs bodyweight.  However, Evan’s foods (especially at the end) were primarily fat and protein.  This meant he was achieving effectively zero blood sugar spike from his food, which also meant no crash, which meant no “energy crisis” response from the body compelling him to seek more food to eat in order to get his blood sugar stabilized.  It remained stable and consistent throughout the day, so he never needed to eat in order to correct his blood sugar: just to get enough nutrients.

 

Which, on that note, he posted his daily protein intake, and was consistently achieving around 140+g of protein.  For a 180lb trainee engaging in resistance training (15 minutes a day, according to his Instagram), he was hitting Stan Efferding’s recommendation of .8g per pound of bodyweight, and per Dr Ted Naiman’s hunger hypothesis, his protein forward diet was allowing him to obviate hunger by successfully consuming enough of the nutrient.  Additionally, by being in a (most likely) ketogenic state, Evan’s body was primarily relying on bodyfat and ketones for fuel, the latter of which is an ABUNDANT fuel source and neither of which tend to promote a hunger/blood sugar response.  Whatever carbs his body needed were being converted from protein through a process known as gluconeogenesis.

 

Had Evan attempted a similar approach of nothing but McDonalds, but set his calorie limits the same and only allowed himself French fries and ice cream, I posit that he simply would NOT have achieved the same outcome.

 

VARIABLES


There's always something

 


It should be appreciated that Evan was apparently working as a kayaking instructor and went out of his way to walk 10k steps per day on busy work days and 15k steps per day on non-busy days.  He was also engaging in 15 minutes of resistance training 4-6 times per week.  These are all excellent practices in general, and I feel this is more a feature rather than a bug when we consider that he was eating 1750 calories per day and NOT feeling hungry during the process.

 

And, of course, everyone is going to want to say “bloodwork bloodwork bloodwork”.  Is this diet healthy?  Who knows.  Is it healthier than how the majority of Americans are eating?  I’ll say yes.  Is weight loss one of the fastest ways to achieve positive health outcomes?  Also yes.

 

IN SUMMARY


This was an entirely different (yet also "successful") McDonalds diet


 

The “McCarnivore Diet” works because it’s sustainable, psychologically, physiologically, financially and logistically.  It works because it has a structure and guidelines designed to promote COMPLIANCE, NOT a set of rules intended to promote GUILT.  It celebrates success: it doesn’t punish failure.  And the foods that comprise the diet are built to perpetuate sustained compliance, rather than simply setting a guideline of calories/macros and being agnostic to the impact that specific foods have biologically and metabolically.  Despite it being “The McCarnivore Diet”, there is nuance to it that has to be appreciated. 

 

 

Saturday, July 25, 2026

TACTICAL BARBELL III (OPERATIONAL ATHLETE) REVIEW

BOTTOM LINE UP FRONT (BLUF)


Apparently TB follows Zelda rules, where the third one may actually be the best ever

·       Buy this book.  I read someone refer to this as “What 5/3/1 Forever should have been”, and that’s a great summary.  And 5/3/1 Forever is one of my favorite books on training, because it quite literally gives you all the training tools you need for the rest of your life, but THIS book does so in a way that is laser focused, clear, concise, and “Army-proof”.  If you screw up what is written in THIS book, it’s clearly a “you” issue.  And much like I wrote about 5/3/1 Forever, I can not BELIEVE the price of this book and how it’s NOT $100.  You are practically stealing when you get this.

 

WHERE I’M COMING FROM


I have a lot of military influence to inspire me

·       I’m 40 years old.  I’ve been exercising for 26 years.  I’ve competed in martial arts, grappling, powerlifting and strongman, and I’ve run races of various distances.  I’ve read a LOT of books on physical transformation/training, and reviewed many of them as well.  This book is on my Mount Rushmore of training books and in the race for the #1 spot.  

 

WHAT’S SO GREAT ABOUT THIS BOOK?


He strikes me more as a Vince Gironda kinda guy

·       This is an “all-in-one” manual on how to accomplish any general training goal while ALSO providing one the tools necessary to be able to tailor toward specific goals (assuming they have the requisite background knowledge/experience to identify what their specific demands are).

·       Because of that, this book takes the time to pick from the “greatest hits” of Books 1 and 2 to be able to give you everything you need in order to get bigger, stronger, and more physically capable WITHOUT being overwhelmed by choices.  And it also means you don’t need to navigate between multiple books in order to construct a plan.  As a former fast food junkie, the analogy is that this is a McDonald’s Express like you’d find in an airport, rather than a full menu McDonalds.  You can get a Big Mac or a Double Quarter Pounder, but there’s no filet-o-fish.

·       This is also a VERY easy read.  Only a few instances where I got tripped up on an acronym or had to double back to confirm something.

 

WHAT’S NEW/WHAT EXCITED ME?


It's not just more of the same...although this DOES excite me


 

·       I absolutely love the creation of the “work capacity” block of training.  This was an idea that I was kicking around with my own mutation of Tactical Barbell that was given wings/permission by the author.  It’s no secret that I’m a fan of absolutely stupid workouts that leave me completely trashed and take more than they give, and my original genius plan was to run a 3 week Operator/Black block where I used these workouts as my HICs.  Basically just get it out of my system and then get back to productive training.  This book, instead, made those workouts the FEATURE of a training block, with an option to focus on power or strength endurance during the non-HIC workouts, still in a 3 week duration.

·       Base building has been redeveloped.  Now it’s a 4 week block vs an 8 week block.  My Tactical Barbell dirty secret is I’ve never done Base Building, primarily because that 8 week block was just a bridge too far for me, and after 2+ decades of exercising I felt like my base was built.  But I can absolutely open myself up to the idea of a 4 week hiatus from hard lifting to be able to develop other physical qualities.  That looks especially appealing in the summer months.

·       The “activation” portion of the book is a complete cradle to grave 25 week training protocol with everything spelled out.  I don’t have any intention to run it myself, but I love that there is something in the book to say “just do this” for anyone struggling to come up with an idea.

·       New conditioning protocols.  Black and Green have been re-tooled, and there is an introduction for “Blue” as well.  Without giving away too much, this just continues to open up more and more options to make TB modular to any training demand.  And much like I’ve written about 5/3/1, the introduction of NEW material doesn’t obviate the old material.  This doesn’t make TB1 and 2 “not work”: it affords more tools in the toolbox.

·       Expanded options for previous lifting protocols.  As above: more tools in the toolbox. 

 

INSPIRED IDEAS FROM THE BOOK  


It's not QUITE this bad, but...


·       That Work Capacity block of training is honestly just perfect for my own Strongman preparation training block idea I’ve created through Operator Pro.  My current approach is a 6 week block of Pro using the hypertrophy ranges for the secondary work (10, 8, 6) and then a 6 week block with the strength ranges (all 5s).  That’s 12 weeks leading into a comp.  From there, one could spend the final 3 weeks doing ONLY events and power or strength endurance work depending on what needs bringing up, and just put aside the basic barbell strength work.  And if a 15 week training block is too long, 3 weeks can get cut from one of the preceding blocks to make up for it.  Factor in a bridge week as appropriate.

·       Speaking of Operator Pro, I feel like this particular template opens itself up to be run in a Conjugate manner (which, for the real lifting nerds out there, I’m sure my understanding of conjugate isn’t “real conjugate”, but it’s what I understand from Westside Barbell), similar to the Cube Method.  Since the training blocks are 3 weeks long, that’s the max duration for a max effort movement rotation.  The 2-3rm daily max is effectively a max effort movement.  Each day, 1 of the 3 is featured primary movements gets a 2-3rm set.  After that, the remaining 2 movements are trained in a submax manner.  This opens up the opportunity to train them in either a repetition effort manner OR a dynamic effort manner: use the hypertrophy range for the former and the strength range for the latter.  So, as an example, we have a day where we set a squat 2-3rm (max effort), then bench press for 5x10 (repetition effort) and deadlift for 5x5 (dynamic effort: make sure to perform each rep explosively).  Next workout, we bench for a 2-3rm, deadlift for 5x10 and squat for 5x5.  Then, after 3 weeks, we change the primary lift of the day to a new variation (front squat instead of back squat, for example).  We COULD swap out the secondary lifts too, or keep them in place for technique work.  And, if we wanted to get REALLY conjugate, we could swap the primary lift more frequently than at the end of the 3 week cycle.         

 

WHAT ISN’T THERE?


Makes sense to me


 

·       The book doesn’t tell you HOW to perform the movements (as in, there are no instructions on what a good squat looks like, running technique, etc).  In classic parlance, it doesn’t tell you “how to suck the egg”.

·       This book doesn’t contain the explanations for the how behind they why with the methodology as it relates to strength.  TB1 explained the value of frequent sub-maximal practice in order to develop strength, and why we DON’T need to slaughter ourselves in the weight room to grow.  However, this book does do a good job of re-explaining the value of the aerobic capacity for anaerobic work, similar to TB2.

 

WHAT ELSE DO YOU NEED?


We're lacking ambition here

·       I feel like a trainee could buy this book and not buy books 1 and 2 and be alright, but I feel like Mass Protocol still contains enough unique information/approaches to it that it’s worth having in addition to this book.  Along with that, TBIII makes specific references TO Mass Protocol without “giving up the goods”, so it will give you more tools in your toolbox.  You most definitely COULD achieve hypertrophy goals using just what is available in this book, but Mass Protocol will expand that AND help get you into the “mass building mindset”.  It also contains different nutritional and conditioning protocols that are specific for the mass building function.

·       There’s a fair argument to pick up “Ageless Athlete” if you are an aging athlete.  It’s a VERY different book (which makes sense, with it being a different author), and it provides some excellent training strategies and psychology to help vector your way toward success.  That said, I’m 40 years old and still trying to train like I’m not…

 

IN SUMMARY









·       Buy this book.  Buy multiple copies, in case you lose one.