The quote for today’s post comes by way of John W. Bergman, a retired Lieutenant General in the United States Marine Corps turned politician, and it is of no shock to me to find that such an outstanding quote comes from a Marine, because god bless them and I’m glad they’re on our side. I still talk about how much it imprinted on me that Marines eat a meal of steak and eggs after completion of “The Crucible” because it is “A warrior’s breakfast” and, in turn, whenever I eat that meal I feel a connection to these warriors…but I’ve already digressed here. I love this quote not just for it’s originator but for the message it contains, and how incredibly applicable it is to those in the physical transformation sphere. At age 40, after 26 years of training in some manner, I have a degree of patience one tends not to observe amongst the younger population, simply because they do not have the experience I have to know that we DO have plenty of time in this pursuit, that there IS no real urgency, and that, often, all we can do is plant the seed and wait for it to grow. We cannot rush the process, and funny enough, in attempting to do so, we tend to actually make things move SLOWER rather than faster. And that’s the ultimate irony of all of this: so often, these efforts that trainees undertake in the pursuit of saving time end up COSTING them time, and if they had simply done things correctly the first time, they’d be SO much further ahead of the game than they end up being. Success leaves clues, but, unfortunately, experience is a cruel mentor, as we have to wait until the hot stove burns us before we learn not to touch it, no matter what those who have been burned before try to warn us, and, in turn, here I am futilely attempting once again to impart the wisdom of my experience unto those future stove touchers because, in turn, it appears that I myself have not learned from my own experience yet. But here we go: once more unto the breach dear readers.
That was always my experience with Ikea
The most
frequent sin I see in regards to the attempt to save time having the reverse
effect is, of course, in the pursuit of gaining muscle. This should be the simplest physical pursuit
(NOT the easiest, quite the opposite, but that’s also probably one of the
contributing variables) a young trainee can engage in: lift weights, try to
lift heavier weights, and when you can’t lift heavier weights, eat more food
until you can. That’s, quite literally,
how it works. Bruce Randall demonstrated
that you can take that approach for YEARS and actually DOUBLE your bodyweight
in the process if you are so inclined, and Paul Anderson achieved something
quite similar, as did Doug Hepburn. But,
in turn, those individuals also demonstrated something else about the process:
you’ll put on bodyfat when you eat a lot of food. Which, again, should be of NO surprise to
anyone with the most basic of understanding of biology and metabolism…yet this
one fact is so ABHORRENT to many a young trainee that they put their fingers in
their ears and go “la la la la MAINGAINING” in the hopes of chasing away the
bodyfat boogieman so that they can piles on slabs of muscle without an ounce of
bodyfat blurring their Instagram ready abs.
Which yeah:
I’ll take the potshot at social media here, because it’s primarily responsible
for this epidemic among younger trainees.
Prior to everyone ALWAYS being on camera ALL the time, there was an
understanding that physiques themselves were seasonal, with a bulking and
cutting season factored into anyone’s plan who cared to actually achieve
physical greatness. Arnold lost his abs
in the off season, and he wasn’t alone.
To the point that some bodybuilders in the magazine eras actually took
to have photoshoots done with multiple outfits for hundreds of shots that they
could leak out over the course of the year to create the ILLUSION that they
walked around contest ready year round as a method to SABOTAGE their
competition in attempting to do the same: effectively robbing them of their
off-season gains.
The internet would call this "fat" these days
And there it
is! The dudes in the 60s and 70s
understood the value of the off-season bulk so much that they tried to STEAL it
from their competition, and meanwhile young trainees are doing it to themselves
on purpose! They refuse to actually eat
enough food to CAUSE muscular development to occur, because this tends to
require ALSO eating enough food to cause bodyfat to accumulate in SOME
manner. So they engage in a 16 week
“muscle gaining” training block, only to gain…no muscle. BUT at least they were training really hard
during that block so now they’re exhausted AND their hormones are out of whack
because they’re a bubbling font of cortisol with no meaningful nutritional
intervention in place to aid in recovery.
Why did they suffer for these 16 weeks to achieve nothing? So that they wouldn’t have to go on a cut of
course! Why? Because time spent cutting is time NOT spent
gaining muscle. Ok, that tracks…but
isn’t time spent NOT gaining muscle ALSO time spent…not gaining muscle? Didn’t we do exactly what we DIDN’T want to
do IN our attempt to not do the thing?
Holy cow that’s a lot of negatives.
Let me see if I can dig us out of this hole.
We were
trying to save the time of the cutting phase by not putting on enough fat
during the gaining phase to need to cut, operating under the premise that this
would mean MORE time we could spend gaining muscle. But if we’re doing a 16 week gaining phase
and then an 8 week cutting phase (a 2:1 ratio), This allots for 32 weeks a year
to gain, 16 weeks to cut, and 4 weeks of fudgery (I imagine those could just be
deloads between phases, but god forbid you suggest a DELOAD to this generation
of trainees). Ok, let’s do some more
math here. If muscle is 75% water, this
means every pound of muscle you build is 4lbs of bodyweight total. Lean bulking advocates quote lots of numbers,
but let’s say that they’d all be comfortable with .5lbs of WEIGHT gained per
week. Assuming this weight is 100% muscle
and water, no fat whatsoever (already impossible), this would mean putting on
.125lbs of MUSCLE per week, OR .018lbs per DAY.
That’s 8g of muscle per day. If
we took that extra 16 weeks we “waste” by cutting and invested it 100% into
gaining muscle, this means we get to put on an extra…2lbs of muscle that
year. THAT is what all of our diligence
bought us. THAT is what we get for
weighing our toothpaste to make sure we didn’t accidentally overshoot our
macros and put on “too much” bodyfat.
Except in this version, 6 weeks later, we're STILL getting sand kicked in our face at he beach
NOW
consider, instead, what we’re missing out on when we do, in fact, squander
those 32 weeks a year. If we actually
DID eat enough to maximize muscle growth during that time, we’re earning that
4lbs of muscle and, with it, 16lbs of bodyWEIGHT total each year, alongside
whatever fat comes along for the ride.
And since we actually ATE well enough to fuel hard training sessions, we
trained hard enough DURING those 32 weeks that some time spent cutting away the
fat with some easier training is going to feel refreshing AND it’s going to
give us a whole host of biological and metabolic benefits, such as improved
systemic recovery, greater insulin resistance, a ramped DOWN metabolism so that
it’s no longer an arm’s race to mainline food into us to gain (check out Bruce
Randall’s legendary eating feats for some reference), etc. But, here again, the attempt to save time
will inevitably force the trainee to waste time, because if you ever want to
see a trainee in a crisis, find a trainee looking to lose some bodyfat.
Bodyfat loss
is NEVER on a “take it as it comes” schedule, but instead ALWAYS a crisis. People always need to lose the fat YESTERDAY,
and they’re willing to do WHATEVER it takes to make that happen…except be
patient. And the fitness industry
thrives on this crisis through predatory business practices targeting these
folks in crisis. No one is selling “get
abs in 2 years” but instead “lose 30lbs in 30 days” and other “get fit quick”
schemes, and people gobble them up, because desperate people are willing to
suspend disbelieve in the place of hope, which is how “the lottery”
exists. So IF a trainee somehow actually
permits themselves to put on a little bodyfat during the gaining process, they
completely undo any benefit they obtained FROM gaining by attempting to employ
what is all too accurately referred to as a “suicide cut”.
The sad thing is, this WAS supposed to be a punchline...
We’ve all
seen these, 2-3 a day training schedules, hours of cardio, a diet of protein
powder and lettuce, etc. We’re going to
burn off ALL this fat in WEEKS, if not DAYS, so we can get RIGHT back to
gaining. And we’ve also all seen the
outcome of these approaches, primarily by way of the recent “Biggest Loser”
documentary on Netflix, but even before that, yo-yo dieters were a well known
phenomenon. IF this person manages to
see the diet all the way to the end, they end up stringy and strung out, with
their hormones completely tanked, and though they are a SMALLER version of
their previous self, they are not a LEANER version of that self. They just hemorrhaged all that lean tissue
they had spent time building. And they
are prone to fits of binge eating, which not only reverses the weight loss but
tends to result in “bodyfat OVERSHOOTING”, wherein the body accumulates MORE
bodyfat than what was lost as it’s attempting to rapidly re-acquire the lean
tissue it lost, for it’s far easier for the body to BUILD that fat vs the lean
tissue. So now the trainee ends up in a
worse place than where they started, ensuring they’ll need an even LONGER
cutting phase if they want to lose a similar amount of weight, to say nothing
of the fact that FIRST they’ll need to have engaged in a gaining phase in order
to rebuild all that lost lean tissue in the first place. In attempting to rush the fat loss, they’ve
put themselves WAY behind schedule.
Because as
Dan John says, the body has to be “nudged” toward fat loss. And this IS a revelation from Dan, who has on
previous occasions mentioned the need for short intense fat loss phases ala the
Velocity Diet and Tabata Front Squats, but it’s proof of concept of the
evolution of thought and wisdom of experience in the training realm. Those short blitzes can be a helpful “running
start” into a fat loss phase, but ultimately it’s gradual and sustainable
modifications paired with appropriate training stimulus that wins the day. And again: how incredibly unsexy. No one is selling THAT program. But that’s because it’s poor job security to
give away the keys to the kingdom when you can INSTEAD sell people on the idea
of maingaining and suicide cutting so that they’re always getting strung along
for the next “fix” for the very problem YOU created.
An arms dealer selling to both sides sets themselves up for perpetual business
And I
haven’t even touched the training aspect of this, but I’m already 2000 words
deep, twice as long as a traditional post.
So here I am “not doing it right” the first time and putting myself in a
place we’re I’ll have to write another post to get all my thoughts captured,
but take the lessons from what we’ve seen here.
The trainees that try to avoid fat gain so that they can spend longer
building muscle end up achieving neither outcome, while those that attempt to
rush the fat loss process so that they can RETURN quickly to the muscle
building process put themselves FAR off the timeline. There’s no shortcut or replacement for time
and patience, and those who are effectively able to implement and utilize those
tools are those that are able to succeed “the first time”.

