THE METHOD IS THE GOAL

Writing my titles in all caps actually handicapped me on this one, because I want to place emphasis on the word “is” here, to state that the method IS the goal, in much the same way that chaos IS the plan.  This is something I realize has always set me apart from the majority of those pursuing physical transformation in this current era, and, truthfully, I cannot explain where or why I developed this mindset: it just always seems to have been there.  Perhaps it was from years of growing up watching training montages, because that’s what the majority of movies were in the late 80s and early 90s, but it’s very much been a matter for me of focusing on the journey rather than the destination.  But even under that lens, we observe trainees who may purport the same ideology and still come to differing conclusions, claiming that the end state will merely be a consequence of the methodology yet still end up mired in all the wrong details and, subsequently, the wrong methodology.  Honestly, I’ve dug myself into a hole with this introduction, so now, allow me to dig myself back out by explaining what the hell it is that I am talking about.

It's so obvious

 

In the realm of physical transformation, there is an abundance of methods out there that one can employ to achieve success.  In this post internet boon especially, there is no shortage of training and nutritional protocols available to anyone, completely free and instantly accessible, for any possible training goal.  Some of these are even good!  While some are, of course, and absolute dumpster fire put together by a charlatan with no qualifications whatsoever relying purely on the naivete of neophytes in the world of physical transformation who are easily hookwinked and refuse to put in a minute of research before buying off on the next miracle snakeoil.  But grumpy old man ranting aside, even before the net, there was STILL a wild abundance of training and nutritional methodologies available, from the wild musings of part time genius and part time lunatic Vince Gironda to Arnold’s (most likely ghostwritten) Encyclopedia of Modern Bodybuilding to the Bob Hoffman York Barbell Club approach to the works of John McCallum in Strength and Health, etc etc.  And again: ALL of these methods were achieving success, so long as one variable was controlled: compliance.  Yes, as I wrote quite recently: compliance remains the science.

 

Ok, so THAT having been established, here is where trainees tend to fall off a cliff.  A trainee decides that their goal is to gain muscle.  In doing so, they determine that the method to get there is to put on .5lbs per week, because that is, apparently, the maximal amount of bodyweight one can put on in a week to ensure that they are gaining maximal muscle and minimal fat.  Minimal fat gain is, of course, crucial for the muscle building process because…actually, I’m not sure why.  Isn’t that the reason we follow it up with a cut phase?  OH, that’s right: no one wants to do those anymore because…well, the reason they SAY is because it’s better to have longer sustained gaining cycles so it’s ideal to put on as little fat as possible so one can gain indefinitely…but I surmise the truth is because they perceive cutting as “hard” because it means NOT eating yummy food all the time.  And though it feels like I’m digressing, this actually takes me right to my point here: the goal has been lost because the method was never really established in the first place.  This trainee started off with an alleged goal of “muscle gain” which instantly transpired into a goal of “minimize fat gain”: NOT the same thing as “gain muscle”.  Because one of the BEST ways to minimize fat gain is to LOSE fat by undereating…which is EXACTLY what these trainees end up doing in their alleged muscle gaining phases.  They undereat, in fear of exceeding their .5lbs per week threshold because they’re actually working a separate sub-goal that opposes the primary goal and end up squandering an entire training phase, spinning their wheels for months on end and NOW they’re just exhausted from all the hard training without adequate nutrition.

We found their ideal physique 

 

For some reason, this wasn’t how I operated.  Instead, I always focused on the method.  I’d state that my goal was to gain muscle, and then I’d pick a PROGRAM that was supposed to get me there.  5/3/1 BBB, Super Squats, Mass Made Simple, Deep Water, Tactical Barbell Mass Protocol, DoggCrapp, Building the Monolith, etc, all of these methods were the methods for success.  From there, outside of Super Squats, wherein I was specifically seeing if I COULD put on 30lbs in 6 weeks (spoilers: I got 12, which was still awesome), I honestly never bothered to weigh myself during the process.  My goal was to gain muscle, and my method was selected, and, in turn, NOW my goal was to FOLLOW THE METHOD.  And, in truth, with so many of these programs being just psychotically challenging, my goal was to SURVIVE the method, which meant that the eating portion sorted itself out completely.  I just dedicated myself to eating as much as I needed to eat in order to be able to get through the next workout and, eventually, through the entirety of the program.  I didn’t care about my bodyweight: I cared about building enough muscle to be able to tackle the weights of the next workout.  And, in turn, whenever I completed these methods, there was never any doubt that I had put on muscle at the end.  For 5/3/1 BBB specifically, I remember that my physique had so radically transformed that my wife’s co-worker, who hadn’t seen me since I started the program, legit thought that my wife got divorced and re-married since I’d last seen him.  He then immediately demanded I share the program with him, and in my mind he set off on his own 5/3/1 journey and achieved success…it’s at least a good story.

 

But making the method the goal doesn’t have to relate to psychotically challenging gaining programs: this can totally fit in with Dan John’s “park bench” workouts AND nutrition for that matter.  So often, trainees end up in some sort of state of ennui whenever “the big event” ends.  It could be an actual physical competition, or some sort of beach vacation where they wanted to look their best, or the completion of one of the above programs, but either way they find themselves listless and lost yet NOT looking for yet another challenge to overcome.  Well why not make the method the goal here?  Why not say “For the next 6 weeks, I’m only going to allow myself to miss 1 workout, and only 2 meals will be off-plan”?  What will be the results of this level of dedication?  Who cares: don’t worry about the outcome, don’t make THAT the goal: make the method the goal.  Because, in truth, we ALL know that dedicated compliance TO training and nutrition will always yield SOME sort of positive: it just simply doesn’t need to be one that is stringently measured.  If you tell yourself that you HAVE to lose .5lbs a week or else your diet and training has failed you, you’ll end up stressing yourself out with every small jump up in water weight or accidental salt overload.  But if you decide that you’re going to give the Warrior Diet a fair 30 day trial of strict adherence while hitting Easy Strength for Fat Loss 5 days a week, at the end of those 30 days you’ll absolutely see positive results of SOME type and, from there, be able to dedicate yourself to the NEXT method.

This is more like "park bench space shuttle bench"

 

Perhaps this is, in reality, a discussion of faith.  When I undertook these programs, I had full faith in their ability to produce results, so long as I followed them diligently, in much the same way those that ascribe to a religious dogma believe they will be granted their eternal reward with their own adherence, or how those bonded by marriage (ideally) have faith in their partner to remain…faithful.  And, continuing on with that analogy, you have those in marriages held together by the thinnest of strings wherein one or both partners are constantly doubting the faithfulness of the other, constantly checking on them, spying, doubting and, ultimately, not experiencing marital bliss, or the follower of a religion who finds their faith shaken, full of doubt and angst.  Those latter people are the ones chained to the scale, constantly monitoring the results of their “adherence” to the method, questioning all outputs and wondering if they are actually moving toward their purported goal.  If these folks simply had faith in the method, they could make the method the goal, prioritize compliance, and observe the outcome that results from putting consistent effort in over a long enough timeline. 

 

And, to question these questioners: why WOULD you undertake a method if you had no faith in its ability to succeed?  Therein is the first mistake on this journey.  I never assumed it was the method that was broken: I figured I had to be the one that was screwing things up if I wasn’t getting the results I wanted.  And if there WAS a method I had no faith in (hello Mike Mentzer’s HIT and high carb diets), I didn’t follow them.  It didn’t matter if the whole world told me that something HAD to work: if it didn’t win my faith, I wouldn’t follow it.  It’s why I HAVE gone off on some of the wildest training and nutrition protocols possible, to include my current approach wherein I’m explicitly ignoring the excellent advice by K. Black and following his Mass Protocol with a Carnivore Diet: because I am, quite frankly, not a smart man but I am VERY good at being absolutely loony tunes bonkers and bending reality to my will to make my kaleidoscope of fractured reasoning achieve my desired outcomes.  I am drawn to these wild and whacky methods, I invest my faith in them, and I make experiencing them the goal, and in doing so I achieve the goal I set out for.

Sometimes faith can be a little confusing

 

Make the method the goal.  Make it your goal to see it through to the best of your ability, and observe the outcome.      

KEEPERS OF LORE, SOOTHSAYERS AND GOSSIPS

Continuing on with my theme of the tribe gathering around the communal fire and storytelling, allow me to discuss the types of individuals one can encounter at these communal fires and the value of their contributions.  I’ve broken this down into 3 categories: keepers of lore, soothsayers, and gossips.  Keepers of lore would fundamentally be those storytellers I prized in my earlier writings: those that know the history of the tribe, it’s stories, myths and legends, and are able to retell these events and weave together the tapestry of bits and pieces of information, lore and knowledge into a comprehensible and understandable narrative.  Anyone can know random facts and trivia, but the ability to recall them WHEN they are relevant and present them in manner that is appreciable to the audience is the real value.  We then have soothsayers: those wild-eyed mystics who gaze into the abyss and attempt to foretell the future and fortunes of those in attendance.  Whereas the keepers of the lore are concerned with the past, the soothsayers speak to the future.  And then the gossips, who speak only of the present, the people that are here and now, and the goings-ons as they occur.  What is the key difference of the third group here?  It takes NO talent to be a gossip, which is why, at any communal fire, there will be a disproportionate amount of gossips compared to Keepers of Lore and Soothsayers.

Not a keeper of lore...but there IS lore around this keeper

 

In the realm of physical transformation, we absolutely NEED Keepers of Lore.  Those iron historians that can re-tell the stories of Pat Casey hitting a 600lb bench press in 1967 in a t-shirt on a rickety bench that looks like something from a yardsale off a diet of meatloaf sandwiches slathered in mayo while Paul Anderson was squatting 1100lbs out of a hole he dug in his backyard, a trick Bob Peoples taught him, while chugging a mix of milk and honey between sets.  To say nothing of those TRUE historians that can cite instances of the first set of dumbbells found in ancient Greek gladiatorial training centers, or the use of heavy clubs with Indian wrestlers dating back to well before Christ, or how the Spartans learned to eat a diet of barley vs grain and venison vs pork and, subsequently, found themselves leaner than their Athenian counterparts.  We learn SO much about the future by looking into the past, because the physical transformation gestalt is cyclical, much like everything else in existence.  Styles and practices ebb and flow, with high volume being the training style du jour one day only to be replaced by HIT the next, only to transition to functional patterns, only back to abbreviated training, only to come back to traditional bodybuilding.  And nutrition experiences similar instances of en vouge practices followed by the immediate counter-reaction, with us observing low-carb’s popularity in the 70s, and then the 90s, and then the 2010s and then the counter-reaction of high carb in the 80s and currently.

 

What we can gain, among many things, from these Keepers of Lore is the common trends that ran deep among those that succeeded and how we can apply them to our current situation.  On the micro-level, all these methods can appear wildly different, but the historical perspective affords us the luxury of being able to step back and analyze from far away, and in doing so we are better able to observe what commonalities those who have succeeded have all shared and, consequently, what trends have resulted in failure and burnout.  Effort, consistency and time are those ever present principles, and those who attempt to bypass either of these principles tend to be the ones that we recognize as the snakeoil salesman and charlatans of their era: flashes in the pan remembered as a comical footnote in the annals of history.

 

Although some DO have a little more staying power than others...

In contrast, we have the soothsayers of physical transformation.  Who are these people?  These are the pioneers: the people out there trying new stuff, engaging in their own n=1 studies, subjecting their bodies to all manner of experimentation and embracing this journey with an open mind and an adventuring spirit.  Yes, you can tell how much I love these types of individuals, because the current world of physical transformation is so incredibly neutered, whereas in the past this pioneering spirit was THRIVING with the likes of Bill “Peanuts” West and the original Culver City Westside Barbell crew recruiting any and every strong human they could find on the planet in order to try out whatever whacky method they could come up with in order to get as strong as physically possible (which, consequently, is why they housed Pat Casey and Superstar Billy Graham as the only two individuals on the planet that could bench over 600lbs in the 1960s).  And here I am talking about the past when I talk about the future, but we saw this same spirit with the other Westside Barbell crew of Louie Simmons, where according to everyone that actually read the Russian literature, Louie COMPLETELY misunderstood it…and still made his misunderstanding totally work by creating his own incredibly unique system totally out of scratch, constantly modifying, tweaking and inventing stuff while experimenting on his stable of mutants in order to create the most dominant powerlifting gym of it’s era.  While everyone else was content to just do what everyone else was doing, these pioneering individuals gazed into the future and JUMPED ahead of the curve.

 

I love listening to soothsayers at the communal fire.  The first time I heard Shawn Baker discussing carnivore on Mark Bell’s podcast, it completely blew my mind how totally contrarian everything he said was to everything I’d ever heard, which of course drew me in.  It was the same hearing Jon Andersen discuss Deep Water, or hearing Jamie Lewis discuss…anything, despite him truthfully being a Keeper of Lore, because he took that information and used it to reach INTO the future and drag us through a timeportal.  In modern times, I look to those that are espousing ideas that run counter to what is currently being purported, because, quite frankly, I have SEEN what modernity is producing, and I am NOT impressed.

Although the future doesn't look too bright either

 

Which leads us to the gossips: those who are only pre-occupied with the goings-ons of the here and now.  Again: why are there so many gossips?  Because it requires NO talent to be a gossip.  All of us are equipped with the faculties to look at what is currently transpiring and regurgitate it to anyone who will listen to us: hell, you can train a parrot to perform that trick.  These people gather around the communal fire and simply discuss those that are already present and what they are already doing: who cares?  We all already KNOW all of this: why don’t you bring some value to the fire and tell me a story about the past or a prediction of the future?

 

You readers of academic studies who simply share what was contained in an abstract that you overheard some influencer discussing on a 60 second Tik Tok reel: you are contributing no value to the discussion at the fire.  Hell, these studies are always “yesterday’s news” as it is, for even a GOOD study (already a rarity) has to undergo so much scrutiny and review that, by the time the information comes out, those bros that were in the trenches already figured out all this stuff 20 years ago.  And yet, when they tried to share it with you as a Keeper of Lore, you called it anecdote and bro-science, but now that someone slapped a study name on it and acquired a funded grant it suddenly has legitimacy?  Your preoccupation with the present is, ironically enough, keeping you behind everyone else that is eagerly lapping up the stories of the past and the predictions of the future in order to achieve their own transformations.  While you prattle on about the gossip of the day, others are equipping themselves with lore and fortunes to be able to overcome the challenges of the future with the wisdom of the past.

This is the sort of maniac prophet I can't wait to listen to!

 

Leave the gossipers to gossip at the fringes of the fire.  Seek out the Keepers of Lore and the Soothsayers and make the most of your time at the fire.  One day, it will go out, and you’ll regret all the stories and predictions left to be told.   

GATHER AROUND THE FIRE

I was actually in the middle of writing another post when I started discussing this analogy within it and realized that THIS was what I wanted to write today, so here we are.  Gathering around the fire is one of the most romanticized images in our human existence, a notion dating back to our earliest ancestors eeking out an existence out in the wilderness after having achieved the mastery of fire and, in doing so, securing our place outside of the state of nature ever so slightly as the group that would one day grow to become the greatest apex predators in existence.  It was around these communal fires that security and shelter were established, food was cooked and victories were celebrated.  The communal fire was were cavepeople found warmth and comfort, where the Mongols heated up their shields and combined various food spoils of war to create the Mongolian grill (allegedly), and, ultimately, where stories, myths and legends were shared.  And in doing so, I’m already sharing stories, myths and legends ABOUT sharing stories, myths and legends, because who knows for sure if this ever really happened around these fires or if it’s just something we created in order to perpetuate our own romantic ideals in order to have something worth striving for…but, in that regard, what does it matter if it’s true?  Which is the same thing to ask when it comes time to share these stories around our communal fire.  Let’s not let a little thing like truth get in the way of a good story.

This was a lie told in a story about a sport that didn't exist...which made the story even better

These community fires are what we once had in the gyms and training centers of the world.  Lifters would come together and share ideas, stories, and theories on physical transformation.  It was the science lab, where things were getting tested, results were being observed, ideas were being chained and linked together, and ultimately a cultural tapestry was being weaved with the stories, myths and legends of the iron.  This was supplemented (pun partially intended) with whatever the Muscle Mag du jour had to say that month regarding whatever the current Mr Wonderful was eating, drinking and doing in their training, or whatever wild bit of prophecy Louie Simmons released in this month’s issue of Powerlifting USA, but the information flow was a trickle, sparse, and you could die from thirst trying to drink from it.  Instead, you’d have your local pocket of mythology, your tribal customs and culture that was amalgamated from whatever the resident big guy had shared from his own iron mountain and the remaining bro-science necessary to cover whatever gaps you had.

 

What SHOULD have happened with the advent of the internet and subsequent development of forums and social media?  A much BIGGER fire for us to gather around and, in turn, more stories to share.  We SHOULD have developed a RICHER culture with this opportunity to share.  Instead, we sterilized ourselves.  We eliminated our culture.  We banished stories, because we had no more room for myths and legends in the face of “facts”. 

Oh yeah, this is SO much better than art deco...

 

“God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?”

 

Nietzsche spoke of the same process there: we killed our mythology and replaced our god with science, and in doing so created this idea that there is only ONE “true” way to achieve physical transformation.  But, young philosophers, as the esteemed Dr. Jones pointed out: don’t not mistake fact for truth! 

Also another great philosophical quip

I’m getting away from myself here, let me wrangle it back.  Instead of using this greater sharing capacity to share more stories, people have used it as an opportunity to “fact check” the story tellers.  One mentions Super Squats story of gaining 30lbs of muscle in 6 weeks and the response is “that’s scientifically impossible, reference these studies that discuss the exact amount of muscle one can put on in a 6 week timeframe”.  They hear the diet of a gallon of milk a day and the response is “according to the latest research, no one needs that much of a caloric surplus to put on muscle”.  And, of course, they hear the program and retort “according to my favorite influencer, you don’t need to train that hard to grow muscle, and barbell squats are an outdated and unnecessary movement.”

 

And in all of this, the fact checkers are failing to understand the POINT of a story.  As I wrote: never let a little thing like “the truth” get in the way of a good story.  When stories were shared around the communal fire, the intent was NOT to relay a 100% factual telling of an event that occurred.  A person who does such a thing is NOT a storyteller: they are simply a parrot.  The talent of a storyteller is to captivate the audience, lure them in, keep their attention and, ultimately, impart a message upon them.  The audience should leave the story with more than what they entered with: a lesson, a message, a “takeaway”.  In the story of Super Squats, sure: we get a training program and a diet.  But what we take AWAY from the story of Super Squats is that, in order to achieve extraordinary results in the weight room, one must execute extraordinary effort in their training AND in their diet.  Is the 30lbs of muscle in 6 weeks fabrication?  Perhaps.  Perhaps it’s a bit of a fish story, where the truth was stretched in order to make things more exciting.  Does it matter?  No, because the LESSON of the story is what is important here.  Every trainee who undergoes a legit 6 weeks of Super Squats is transformed at the end of it, not just physically, but spiritually.  Their entire BEING is different, for now they are a creature that knows OBSESSIVE hard work in the gym and in the kitchen.  They know how to live, eat, and breath(ing squat) pursuit of physical transformation, and what drove them to even undertake this journey was the STORY of Super Squats, shared around our communal fire, by wild-eyed storytellers spinning myths and legends.

Whatever story he's telling, I'm listening to

 

NO ONE at the communal fire appreciates that person interrupting the story to interject their thoughts on the factual accuracy of the telling.  It takes no talent to say “there’s no way that could have happened”.  No one needs to hear that John Henry couldn’t possibly outperform a railroad spike driving machine in a competition, or that there were 7000 Greeks to include the 300 Spartans at the Battle of Thermopylae, or any of your other gee whiz useful trivia here.  A good story is going to have some embellishment to it, because reality is boring: it’s why we are striving to transform ourselves into something DIFFERENT from our own reality.  It’s why we are so eager to share our stories and hear the stories of others: because we strive to share and learn as much as we can in order to have the existence we feel is our birthright, through our effort and intensity.

 

Gather around the fire and share some stories, and listen to the stories of others.  Don’t listen with the intent to disprove, but to understand.  To understand WHY the storyteller is telling the story, and what lessons the story holds.  And, in turn, you may one day be the subject of a story.

“COMPLIANCE IS THE SCIENCE”-STAN EFFERDING

I’ve already admitted defeat on this post, as Stan has already explained everything I’m about to write in four words, but allow me to further elucidate, for just like how Dan John has managed to write 3+ books and thousands of pages on a program that Pavel explained to him in just 40 words, it has apparently taken me quite a while to fully grasp the significance of what Stan has spoken.  “Compliance is the science” is Stan’s explanation of how success is achieved in the realm of physical transformation.  Specifically: we have to actually DO the things that get the results we seek, and if we’re unable to comply, we’re unable to succeed.  This seems patently obvious…and yet, it’s probably the most difficult aspect OF the entire physical transformation process.  Acquiring the knowledge necessary to achieve physical transformation is honestly an incredibly easy AND simple (because those are different concepts) undertaking, insomuch that we honestly already have all the instinctual properties necessary to achieve the process in the absence of research.  Nietzsche spoke of the “will to power”: that drive inherent in us as a species to overcome which, in turn, is crucial to the process of physical transformation, and in analyzing the rites of passage of ancient warrior cultures, we’ve observed physical training in the pursuit of achieving superior strength, speed, athleticism, etc spans across the globe and cultures WITHOUT the need for internet access, peer reviewed journals, randomized control trials, etc etc.  As a species, we “know” how to transform ourselves physically, and NOW, with the advent of instantaneous information exchange, we are at no shortage of ability to obtain even MORE knowledge on the subject to fully grasp the material (even though, again, we had dudes bench pressing 600lbs raw in the 1960s…)  Which, in turn, indicates that it’s not about KNOWING what to do that holds us back…it’s DOING what it is that we need to do that holds us back.  Compliance IS the science…which now means the question isn’t “what do I do” but “HOW do I do what it is that I know I NEED to do?”

Even male models know how to get jacked and ripped

 

Which, in turn, is what we REALLY need to be researching when it comes to researching physical transformation.  People experience analysis paralysis in the realm of physical transformation because, in their quest to find THE right answer, they are assaulted with MANY methods that all claim to be the BEST way to achieve their goals.  What these individuals fail to understand is that the presence of so many claims of methods to achieve success is not indicative of CONFLICTING information but, instead, affirmation that there are MANY ways to achieve success in the goal of physical transformation.  ALL of these people claiming that their one specific way is THE best are correct: it just now becomes a matter of determining the best under WHAT context.  And, in the case of those claiming it’s the best, it’s the best under THEIR specific context.  It’s the best for that one particular individual, or the individuals that this person trains with their method.  To which we must now determine if WE fit within that context: are WE the intended consumer of this method.

 

Because when it comes to selecting a training and nutritional methodology, the science remains the same: it’s a matter of finding a way for our stupid lizard brains to actually inclined to comply with the science.  Everyone loves to beat the same drum about nutrition: “it’s always calories in/calories out, no matter what”.  Ok, let’s say that’s the case: how do we get the trainee to COMPLY with calories in/calories out?  Suddenly, NOW, methodology becomes important.  Is a ketogenic diet magical?  Does it break the laws of thermodynamics?  Perhaps not, but what it MAY do is impact the calories OUT side of the equation to a favorable degree that suddenly the trainee can actually ACHIEVE the deficit they’ve been trying to accomplish for so long.  Perhaps the trainee that chained themselves to simply “calories in/calories out” without any other guiding principle ended up dieting themselves down to 800 calories a day through continued restriction, totally broke their metabolism, and are no longer able to achieve the necessary degree of MICRONUTRIENTS in order to feel healthy, normal and energized enough to be able to train (or simply EXIST) in order to achieve their physical transformation goals.  Perhaps this very trainee, undertaking a clinical ketogenic diet with a 4:1 fat to protein ratio is able to upregulate FGF21, resulting in increased energy expenditure, allowing them to take in a few hundred extra calories a day, allowing for more nutrients and improved quality of life such that they CAN continue to comply WITH the science.

It's science!

 

Because we are human: all too human.  We will always need to contend with the human piece of the physical transformation equation.  But if we embrace this, rather than deny it, it opens up avenues for ALL manner of successful methods to help us achieve our goals.  Because, in truth, the science SHOULD be simple when it comes to physical transformation, for it’s a process that EVERY living organism engages in.  It just so happens that FOR us humans, the majority of us engage in a negative form of transformation: self-destruction.  And this is primarily a result of the environment that WE have created for ourselves.  But, in turn, our capacity to manufacture our own doom is also testament to our ability to be our own saviors, so long as we take the time to engage in some introspection and figure out what it takes for US to comply with the science.

 

So yes: the science is the science.  We grow bigger and stronger though progressive resistance exercise, but some of us will only progress if we KNOW the exact sets, reps and percentages we’re going to perform before the workout, while others will only do it under Dan John’s instruction of “use easy weights and nudge it up when they feel light”.  Both are accomplishing the same thing, but if one cannot comply with one set of instructions, they’ll never meet the science that is necessary to achieve the goals.  “Calories in/calories out”, sure, nothing magical about fasting?  Ok, but if fasting is able to finally regulate someone’s WILDLY out of control leptin and ghrelin hormones to the point that they CAN exist in a caloric state WITHOUT white knuckling it, perhaps there IS, in fact, something magical about it.  If a certain nutritional strategy can have someone undereat WITHOUT feeling hungry and weak, or OVEREAT without feeling bloated and sluggish, perhaps such a method will actually compel a training TO comply with the science.  And perhaps THIS is why it’s worth spending the time learning, experimenting, tinkering and questioning: not so we can understand WHY things work, but instead HOW WE can work within the context OF why these things work.  Perhaps every “fad” training program and nutritional strategy isn’t a fad at all, but instead yet another psychological hack one can employ in order to actually get them to comply with the goddamn science.

 

Because as cool as you may think you are by LARPING as a robot, the truth is, you’re as human as the rest of us, and that pesky free will and autonomy that got us to the top of the food chain is the same set of shackles that is preventing you from just shutting off your brain and eating your perfectly balanced macro gruel while training at the exact right intensities and volume to achieve optimal results.  No one is impressed that you “know the science” for physical transformation: we as an entire species figured it all out millennia ago.  We’ve climbed up Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and are no longer concerned with food and security levels of logic: we’ve moved on to self-actualization and are answering questions at an existential level: trying to solve the “problem” of being human.  Try to keep up and help out, by putting away your stupid “CICO” comment and moving on to answering the question of HOW do we comply with the science.