Friday, June 10, 2022

EFFICIENCY IS FOR MOPEDS: I’M GOING TO OUTER F**KING SPACE

  

I will never understand the pre-occupation that so many trainees have with maximizing efficiency.  These dudes are always in a quest to find THE most efficient way to train, such that they get the absolute most bang for their buck, rep to growth wise.  These folks will NEVER employ “junk volume”, or cross into the threshold of diminished returns, or do a single rep more than the absolute “minimum effective dose”.  They’re the same dudes that will choke down dry chicken breasts, refusing to put an ounce of sauce OR effort in food preparation, because that would be an inefficient use of their time and resources.  In the world of efficiency, you wanna know what of the most fuel efficient vehicles out there?  The moped: getting around 130 miles per gallon.  Wanna know a terribly INefficient vehicle?  The space shuttle, which, uses 11,000 pounds of fuel PER SECOND, averaging around 8-9 miles per gallon.  …and guess which vehicle is WAY more awesome?


Even on an awesome show, they can't make a moped awesome

 


Sorry folks: efficiency is for nerds, plain and simple.  And yeah yeah: you have to be a sharp cookie to be able to fly on the Space Shuttle: let’s not miss the point here.  Any yahoo can go rent a moped and feel the shame of…riding a moped.  Efficiency is so widely available that any consumer can go out and get it.  We have fuel efficient vehicles, time efficient cooking devices (hello Instant Pot), environmentally efficient means of production, etc etc.  A RARE site is one that is produced from INefficiency.  Getting into outer space?  SUPER inefficient.  It takes SO much fuel, time, energy, effort, etc etc, all for what?  TO GO INTO OUTER SPACE, that’s what!  Do you know how inefficient it is to get a gold medal in the Olympics?  Even those countries that have tried to boil it down to a science, hand-selecting trainees at young ages and raising them in state-sponsored training facilities have to take GREAT time, energy and effort in order to achieve those goals…especially compared to the far more efficient method of just making your own.  Hell, even WITH cheating, these countries struggle.

 

But it’s these inefficient things that are SO much cooler to observe, let alone participate in or achieve.  Is efficiency beneficial?  Absolutely.  It greatly benefits the average person, and makes our lives, on average, ultimately better.  But inefficiency is NOT average, and, in turn, part of the process necessary to BE something other than average.  In order to achieve something greater than average, some inefficiency needs to come into play, because ultimately efficiency IS about maximizing output PER input.  It is NOT about maximizing output period dot!  And the gulf between efficiently maximized output and maximized output is a WIDE gulf.  It’s the difference between a journeyman boxer with a record of 100-100-50 and Mike Tyson.  It’s the difference between high school all state champion wrestler and Aleksander Karelin.  It’s the difference between the moped and the space shuttle.  Sure, we CAN admire both…but of the two, which do we really, truly admire?


Pretty sure he ALSO put a fair amount of dudes into space...


 

Cast away the negativity associated with inefficiency: that is the call of the average trying to drag you to their level.  There’s nothing inherently wrong with being inefficient, so long as we understand WHY we are being that way.  Yes: it’s stupid to attempt to put fuel in your vehicle with a bucket when the gas pump is available, but it’s NOT foolish to spend a little extra time, energy and effort applying seasoning and cooking techniques to your food to make eating it an enjoyable experience vs some monk-like existence of eating cold beans and tuna out of the can.  The latter appreciates the tradeoff and reward inherent in exercising inefficiency.  Is it inefficient?  Yes.  Is inefficiently INHERENTLY bad?  No: it simply is.

 

In the pursuit of physical greatness, inefficiency is NECESSARY.  Because, again, this is a discussion of GREATNESS: not most averageness.  The MAJORITY of people that engage in physical activity do so under the auspice of maximized efficiency.  “What activity can I do that will get me the most results with the least effort?”  This is why 8 minute abs was a thing.  It’s why fitness informercials in general are a thing.  It’s why HIIT was so popular when it was first introduced (a full cardio workout in 4 minutes, sign me up!...yeah…about that).  It’s why people will shell out tons of cash for meal prep services that deliver near inedible products (great for fat loss: you won’t eat the food you have and you’re too broke to buy more).  And when you go to any training facility, you get to personally observe the results of these efficient approaches: mediocrity.  People that are ultimately fighting the (losing) battle against time.  They are slowing down their inevitable decline, but in no way are they surviving, let alone THRIVING.


Time is being used efficiency here: we're getting in a bad workout AND poor quality reading

 


Those who choose inefficiency?  THEY are the ones making it happen.  Are they in the gym longer than everyone else?  But of course.  Are they doing too many reps, too many sets, training too often with too heavy weight?  Out of principle, they must!  Do they eat more than is necessary?  Most certainly.  10 sets of 10 when 5 would suffice?  Absolutely.  Because everyone else in the gym is riding around on mopeds, and these dudes are going to outer f**king space.

 

Go be inefficient.  Start adding extra training on top of your training.  Start doing 2 a days, 3 a days, sets every hour on the hour.   Do your conditioning first thing upon waking AND before sleep.  Find new and interesting ways to prepare food.  Shop at 3 different grocery stores to get all sorts of interesting goodies.  Read MORE than just the sets and reps of a program and learn MORE than is necessary to accomplish your goals.  Be efficient in the parts of your life where greatness is NOT the goal.  Be an efficient toothbrusher, efficient dresser, efficient television watcher, have an efficient haircut, but where you WANT to be something greater than average, go be inefficient, and enjoy your time in space.    

13 comments:

  1. Another great post. I really like the analogy of the moped and space shuttle!! If you want to get to awesome you need to awesome things (like sending a 2000+ ton hunk of metal and electronics into space).
    Dan John preaches the benefits of doing inefficient exercises and he's definitely right.
    Personally I get great satisfaction from doing hard innefficient things. A hard lifting or conditioning session. Walking to the shops instead of driving. Going barefoot while taking a walk in the forest. Taking a cold shower once in a while etc etc. Not sure what it is but it feels good for the soul. Haha

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh man, I TOTALLY shoulda remembered that bit from Dan John, because it fits perfect. You're absolutely right too. And a quote that ties it all together comes from JFK “We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win.”

      Delete
  2. Efficiency really is just an excuse to be lazy, and not even very veiled at that. But they pass it off under some pseudo-virtuous standpoint like they should be rewarded for being so smart.

    "What is the minimum I can do to get results" or "The most results for the least effort" are the warcrys of people completely lacking any sort of passion or enthusiasm. It's how I approach my tax return, not the gym for god's sake. Great post.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Such a great point dude! We do things efficiently when we want to NOT do them. And even though I hate training, I don't want to short myself out of results by trying to be as efficient as possible: I want to get ALL the results I can if I'm going to do this crap.

      Delete
    2. Exactly! The "Most results for the least effort" does not equal "the most results" - to your point, to squeeze all the results out you can you're gonna need to plow straight into diminishing returns head first, and do all the junk volume you have time for.

      Delete
  3. I just caught myself thinking myself out of Murph out of efficiency reasons. I am on a new program but also wanted to build up GPP too. I debated with myself for a couple of minutes why Murph is a bad idea, until I realized I just want to be lazy. So I took my weight vest and tried it.
    I needed to modify it, as I am doing strict pullups and I can't do 100 of them with the weight vest yet. Long story short, I made it and while it was a lot, it also wasn't anything crazy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's amazing how our "smarter" side can do such a good job talking us out of those things that make us better, haha. Good on you for getting after it!

      Delete
  4. Ok you convinced me. After this current cycle of 531 I'm rerunning deep water

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Outstanding dude! Let me know how it goes

      Delete
  5. So much to unpack with this one, but in a good way, haha.

    I remember the transition to shift work from a simple 9-5, where I would end up just training every other week. Still made progress. It was minimal effort for minimal progress. The people who want to progress with the minimum amount of effort hated the idea, despite its what they wanted, technically.

    And that goes so much further. Haha. Must have perfect form is another good one, as if anything less than perfect is somehow terrible, when good and passing also exist, and heaven dare someone actually struggle and have any sort of form break down when pushing themselves for a max. Instead what happens is they just spin their wheels wondering why their lifts haven't progressed, for years.

    And then they go and put about as much effort trouble shooting why, on the internet, as they did in their lifting. All the soliloquy in their backstory on their unique life circumstances that led up to this point and none on their program or routine, or what they have tried to figure out their lack of progress, and when pressed its always a list of exercises and somehow shovelling down 4,000 calories all day every day.

    It's so sad and ridiculous to witness.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is amazing how people will take offense if you choose to do something inefficiently, as though it's a personal affront. It challenges them in a manner they don't wish to be challenged: if OTHERS are going about this in this manner...why aren't I?

      Delete
    2. Haha, right? All the while getting bigger and badder as a result.

      Delete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete