The current
fixation with beginner trainees is to follow “beginner programs”, which are
comprised of low reps, few sets, low volume, and high frequency. The justification for this approach is that
it will quickly get a beginner trainee’s numbers up, allowing them to finally
have the strength base to move on to an “intermediate program”. It’s all about speed, making the fastest,
most efficient gains possible.
...you mean there is a way to eat nachos faster?!
As I have
written about many times in the past, these programs are not BUILDING strength;
they are simply realizing the strength that is already there. This is why there is so much variance of
mileage in these programs. Some trainees
can run them and get to a 300lb bench, 400lb squat and 500lb deadlift without
slowing down, while others are lucky to hit 135 for all of those numbers before
hitting the mythical “3 stalls” and then resetting or following a new
program. This is due to the fact that
some trainees start out with significantly greater strength potential due to a
background in athletics or some other form of resistance training which is able
to be peaked at a much higher level compared to a lifelong sedentary
individual. But in any case, what was
the point of all that?
Why must a
beginner progress as fast as possible?
Is this not a lifelong journey?
Tell me, how much further ahead will a beginner who ran Starting Strength
for the first 6 months of their career be compared to a trainee that ran 5/3/1
out the gate when we compare them 10 years down the road? We’re talking microscopic differences if any,
and in all honesty I would argue that the trainee running 5/3/1 was better
prepared to progress.
And hell, after a long enough timeline, it REALLY won't matter
Why? Because actually taking the time to learn a
program with a logical progression scheme that employs a variety of rep ranges,
assistance work, conditioning, and forces you to experiment will give you a far
more valuable skillset than simply doing the same 6 exercises for the same sets
and reps over and over again. We
constantly observe trainees that are simply lost when it comes time to move on
after their fabled “beginner gains” have stalled out, as they learned NOTHING
from the process of training. These
trainees inevitably latch on to an almost identical looking program comprised
of low reps, few sets, and high frequency, with only the minorest of
differences to distinguish it from before.
These programs are “safe”, because once again the thinking element has
been removed from the equation.
Consequently, I have NEVER seen anyone emerge from these programs with
anything impressive physique or strengthwise…have you?
You can not
build strength quickly. I know this
upsets a lot of people, but it’s the truth.
Strength does not get built quickly.
Strength takes many years of grinding away to be amassed. It’s not sexy, it’s not fun, it’s not quick,
but if it WERE any of those things, there would be WAY more strong people
running around. This is why the race to
bigger numbers is a fool’s errand. It
seduces away so many trainees with its false promises of great strength in
little time, but the end result is a trainee who is no better off than when
they began. They became better at a
movement and realized their full potential, but did nothing to actually improve
it.
People like
to say that training is a marathon and not a sprint, but it’s even more arduous
than that. A more apt analogy is that
training is like siege warfare, and all you can hope to do is outlive your
weakness. It’s a war of attrition, there
is no quick ending, it’s brutal and uncomfortable, and in the end you’ll be
pretty beat up from it. However, those
with the discipline to hang back and let the enemy fade away will eventually be
the winners, while those that get too anxious and go for the bayonet charge
right out the gate are going to be the ones that get mowed down by machinegun
fire early.
Theirs not to reason why,
Theirs but to do and die:
Outlive your
weakness. Do not try to directly engage
it, for if you do, it will drag you down to its level.
This blog is quickly becoming one of my favorites. This post recalls thoughts I have had regarding beginner programs and the dogma surrounding them, particularly your statement that a beginner program does not build strength, but realizes it. I have always been suspicious of those who steadfastly believe that any given trainee should be squatting over 300 pounds inside of a few months, and if not "something's really wrong/you're not doing it right."
ReplyDeleteAnyway, I really love these posts. Keep it up!
Awesome man, much appreciated. Thanks for being a reader. The sentiment you discus is when I've written about in the past as well regarding the community of forums. You quickly establish a community based around a core set of beliefs and then ostracize anyone that demonstrates anything that opposes these beliefs. We've seen this repeat in history a LOT, and the lifting community is just a microcosm of it.
DeleteYour blog is dope.
ReplyDeleteWhen you said novice programs simply realize the strength that is there, that made SO much sense. You basically detailed my experience exactly when you talked about the 3 stalls at 135, except for me they were at 115 for bench. Had no idea what to and spun my wheels for a while and was finally able to get it just recently using, guess what, 5/3/1. I know it's not "strong" but at the risk of being too corny, it's progress and it feels both awesome and relieving.
Super glad I found your blog man, I wish more of the r/fitness guys would listen to you.
Hey man, I appreciate that. You're not alone in your experience; pretty much all of this blog is just my current self yelling at my past self for being so stupid, haha. I'm glad you're finding a way forward through this all.
DeleteMost people on the internet would rather be right than strong, so it doesn't phase me that they don't listen to me. The hivemind will always gravitate toward the path of least resistance, and that tends to get the least results.