One of my favorite scenes in cinema comes from the “so-bizarre-it-HAS-to-exist” 90s film “The 5th Element”, wherein criminally underrated (because no matter how many positive things you say about him it wouldn’t be enough) actor Gary Oldman, playing the part of Jean-Baptize Emanuel Zorg, pushes a glass off his table while having a conversation with a space-priest in order to demonstrate the benefits of chaos. With “chaos being the plan”, you can understand already why I’m a fan of this scene. But what unfolds is a symphony of robotics that come to the aid of the situation, one to clean the broken glass, one to replenish the drinker with a new glass, one to fill that new glass with a new beverage, etc. The scene, of course, goes on to demonstrate the benefit of humanity in the face of all these robots, but that’s a dumb lesson, so instead I focus on what Zorg was trying to teach: how the disruption of a harmonious state is more than simply “not negative”, but, in fact, very much positive AND necessary in order for us to achieve higher levels of excellence and, ultimately, realize our maximal potential.
Seriously, just a fantastic movie and scene
This, of
course, comes screaming in on the heels of my post recent posts wherein I have
described the bliss that comes with eating, living and training in a manner
that suits my internal nature, effectively aligning my actions with my
instincts and achieving a truly “intuitive” state of existence. That joy and bliss IS real, BUT, I also
frequently speak to the reality of duality and dualistic forces in nature, and
duality is ALSO key to achieving a harmonious state. Balance is crucial to harmony, and imbalances
create disharmony. Too much virtue and
not enough vice creates disharmony in the same way that too much vice and not
enough virtue do. The external outcomes
may be different (an excessive sinner’s sins tend to impact society to a
greater extent than an Ned Flanders type does), but, internally, the outcome is
disharmony. BUT, when we go into a macro
level here, we are forced to understand a true bit of irony: there is
DISHARMONY in having TOO MUCH HARMONY.
YES! How incredibly comedic: if we exist in a
state of harmony for TOO LONG, we become necessarily disharmonious due to the
lack of disharmony to balance out the harmony!
In order to remain IN harmony, we must necessarily be regularly exposed
to periods of disharmony. I am genuinely
laughing as I write that, because it’s the kind of cruel trick that only nature
can play on us. I wrote about how I
spent far too long in a disharmonious state and how it was destroying me
internally, but I was not existing in that state purely for the sake OF self-destruction:
my intent was to have disharmony force my body and self to achieve some manner
of adaptation in order to overcome the state OF disharmony. Nietzsche’s “will to power” coming into play
there: a catalyst must exist in order to drive adaptation and evolution. Absence a threat from the environment,
there’s no force to drive change within a species, but when something presents
which disrupts harmony, change and adaptation occur. This drives evolution, the realization of
potential and, ultimately, self-actualization, which is a necessary part OF
existing in a harmonious state. Absent
self-actualization, one experience ennui, which, in turn, is in itself a
disharmonious state wherein the only escape is SUBJECTION TO DISHARMONY! Oh my goodness it just doesn’t stop.
Holy cow,
how is this about training? Let me try
to get back to the micro-level here.
Training and nutrition, done correctly, are phasic by nature. This is basic periodization at work. In training, we have conditioning/GPP phases,
accumulation phases, intensification phases, etc. Our nutrition matches to align with these
phases as a means of recovery support.
Phasically structured training is training with the intentional
disruption of harmony effectively built INTO the plan. We give an athlete just enough time to adapt
to the training only to switch it up on them, generate a disharmonious state,
have that state force adaptation, and have adaptation result in growth, and
have that growth be part of the realization of potential. Done correctly, this style of training and
nutrition will ultimately have the athlete realize their MAXIMAL potential and,
ultimately, achieve whatever greatness they have within them. And, in turn, they realize harmony: but only
by EXPERIENCING a necessary degree of the disruption of said harmony. Had we never disrupted their harmony, they
would have never achieved a true state of it, instead existing in a lesser
state, which, in turn, results in the disharmony that comes with NOT realizing
one’s true potential.
I was
experiencing this first hand living intuitively these past few weeks. My heart was full, my mind was clear, I was
joyful…and I found myself growing soft.
I was gravitating to the things I was good at and avoiding the things I
was bad at. I noted that I had stopped
training my abs and arms directly, and, in turn, I observed declines in their
performance. I found my body had gone
flat because I was settled into a style of eating that brought me internal
harmony, and that style included no carbohydrates whatsoever and was purely
animal protein. I was living in a state
of harmony and bliss and, in turn, not making strides toward internal
greatness…and, in turn, experiencing ennui at “this being it”. So I ate a bunch of carbohydrates on a Sunday
evening (but opted for “clean” sources vs my typical junk food Rampages) and
woke up Monday to combine Jon Andersen’s Deep Water program and Dan John’s 10k
swing challenge into 1 workout which I stretched into the full week, because I
recognized that I grow at my best rates when I follow someone else’s programs,
primarily because they will force me to do things I will not do for
myself. And it worked. I started with 10x10 SSB squats with 50
swings between sets to get in 100 squats and 500 swings, and with that workout
on Monday, my legs were sore until Friday.
I kept up my Viking motif through it all, because it’s been an excellent
driver of decision making, and let this disharmonious state drive me toward
adaptation. And now that I’ve discovered
this, I have an idea that, every few weeks, I can inject a “harmony disruptor”
into my intuitive lifestyle in order to keep sharp. This coincides very much with Jon Andersen’s
“catfish” notion written about in Deep Water, alongside Dan John’s “Bus Bench”
training and his 28 day fat loss attack strategy, and so many many other very
smart authors out there that realized all this well before I did.
But, once
again, the comedy here is that, by establishing a PLAN of harmony disruption, I
create a plan that will, necessarily, NEED to be disrupted itself in order for
me to continue to achieve greatness THROUGH the disruption of harmony. Soon, it will become too predictable that I
am disrupting my own harmony in order to achieve greatness, and it will become
necessary to find a new way to do so that is not predictable or stable:
something I myself cannot anticipate.
And perhaps that is something accomplished by NOT disrupting harmony:
“the only winning move is not to play”, to quote Wargames. However it unfolds, the lesson remains: an
abundance of harmony without a necessary degree of disharmony is, in itself,
disharmonious and will result in the dissonance that comes with experiencing
disharmony.
In order to
BE harmonious, we MUST experience regularly bouts of disharmony.
"if we exist in a state of harmony for TOO LONG, we become necessarily disharmonious due to the lack of disharmony to balance out the harmony!"
ReplyDeleteI highly recommend Iain McGilchrist's work. It's heavy on the neuroscience, so if you're into that, I think his worldview is going to resonate with you quite strongly.
Funny thing with the accumulation/intensification framework, I'm just coming off of a few weeks of Lewis' Feast/Famine, thanks to your posts (although with much lighter weights). It's been out-goddamn-standing, but I'm grinding to a halt physically now, and have been looking back at my lifting over the last few years, carefully, trying to figure out when I made the best progress, and when things took a big dump. One of my questions was why these intense periods worked so well sometimes, and failed so hard at others. And guess what? The times that they worked so well that it seemed like I'd found the magic bullet, were preceded by several months of high volume with light weights. At least 4 different distinct times this happened. Almost like... leaders and anchors. When did high intensity programs fail? When I'd already been running other high intensity, low volume programs for months.
It's almost like you guys who've been at this for decades have figure out a thing or two.
Hey, thanks for the recommendation! I'll be sure to give it a look.
DeleteYou made a great discovery there! It's the tragedy of this whole experience: it's an experience! We learn so much through it, and by the time we learn the stuff, we're tool old to use it! Haha. It's why I want to pass on as much as I can.
And that's greatly appreciated. The other tragedy, of course, is that it's almost never enough to read it. Until it hits you from direct experience, it's another piece of trivia. What definitely helps, though, is having the framework ready for when the epiphany does hit. I had to go through this several times to start to really see the truth of the pattern, but I'm positive that having your writing on accumulation/intensification, and Wendler's on leaders/anchors, was necessary to recognize it for what it was.
Delete