I previously
reviewed “5/3/1 Forever” and have announced in many other posts how much I am a
fan of the program and Jim’s philosophy.
That having been said, up until recently, I had been co-opting 5/3/1
principles into my own training to suit my specific goals. After my most recent competition in April of
2017, I had enough downtime that I figured I might as well run some 5/3/1
programs legit and see what happens.
From that time, I ran “Building the Monolith” (which I have reviewed
here), a leader and anchor cycle of “God is a Beast” and 3 leaders of “SVR II”
before moving on to my own training approach which once again steals from
5/3/1. I have sense observed some
fantastic growth in my own training along with some paradigm shifting, and
figured this was as good a time as any to share what lessons I’ve learned and
what takeaways you may experience.
1: You don’t
need to set PRs in training all the time
Dude, Kaz, we still have 2 more sets
One of the
big critiques of 5/3/1 Forever is that “the PR sets are gone!” What actually happened is that programs have
built in leader and anchor cycles, and the PR sets don’t happen till you reach
the latter, but in either case, you spend a LOT more time working in the 5 rep
range now than you did with 5/3/1 first edition. I’ll admit that I approached this with
trepidation at first as well, because the meathead in me said that, if I’m
ALWAYS doing sets of 5, then only the final week of the program is where I’ll
really work hard, because the first 2 weeks will be too light.
And then I
ended up setting a lifetime PR on the press during the anchor of God is a
Beast.
Solid PR on back bending too
I’m not
going to pretend to understand it, but Jim is some sort of alchemist when it
comes to training, and the way he structures the programs work in such a way that,
when you follow them, you get stronger.
It seems all that time spent grinding away on the sets of 5 over a few
cycles sets you up for some big results when you actually go to push for PRs. In fact, I’m STILL reaping the benefits of
this set-up, and despite being now 9 weeks removed from a 5/3/1 program proper,
I am smashing PRs in the press every time I train it. The non-PR sets are where strength is built,
and the PR sets are where it is realized.
2: Full body
workouts are viable at any level
Although you don't need to do the whole thing all at once
Maybe I’m
being presumptuous with that statement as I’m not “advanced”, but odds are, if
you’re reading my blog, you aren’t either, so this works for you. I thought for sure I was beyond this point in
my training, and so I used an upper/lower split for years, specifically ala
5/3/1 first edition with a day for benching, squatting, pressing and
deadlifting. However, Building the
Monolith got me back into full body training, and Jim’s approach to assistance
work has you train the entire body every day, even if the focus is on one
movement. In turn, frequency of muscle
group training is high, as is total volume, yet it works in a fashion that is
completely recoverable. Instead of having
1 day where I absolutely hammered my delts, I’d hit them 4-6 times in a week,
and get in even more volume.
This has
also been a boon for training for strongman competitions, as before I would
need to figure out how to fit event training into my 4 days a week of
lifting. Now, I’ve learned how to
consolidate my lifting into 3 full body days so that I have more time in the
week to focus on event work. I still get
in adequate volume and frequency in lifting, but don’t need to make events an
“afterthought”.
3: You can
train the same muscle groups many times in a row
In this case, you train none of them all the time
Similar to the
above, I was stuck in the mentality that, after you train a muscle group, you
have to let it rest for 48ish hours, because of reasons. This mentality forced my training to be
pretty restrictive, and many times my schedule would get chaotic. However, with 5/3/1’s approach to assistance
work being that the full body gets worked every time you train, I found out
that it was totally possible to recover training the same muscle groups back to
back to back, so long as volume and recovery were accounted for. Yeah; if you do a full on hour workout just
for your shoulders, you shouldn’t touch them again for a few days, but if all
you did was 50-100 reps of some raises, you can come back the next day and so
some presses and be fine. And in the
end, your total volume for the week will be about the same as if you hammered
them for an hour on one day; it’s just a different approach. This opens up a lot more options for training
flexibility and more creative approaches to assistance work.
4: You can’t
push supplemental work and main work hard at the same time
I swear to God I will pistol whip the next person that calls this an "accessory exercise"
This was the
big revelation in Jim’s “leaders and anchors” approach to training, and
something I never wanted to admit to, but was the absolute truth. The main work in the program tends to be
those lifts we are specifically focusing on; for a powerlifting, the big 3, for
a strongman, upcoming competition lifts, etc.
We push those lifts hard whenever we’re trying to improve those specific
lifts, but when that happens, it means that the supplemental lifts, those
additional lifts that DRIVE up the mainlifts, need to throttle back. Volume or intensity needs to be reduced in
order to accommodate for how hard we’re pushing the top stuff. So what do we do when we want to push the
supplemental lifts? We throttle back on the main work, hitting hard and heavy
but not super taxing sets in order to maintain our ability to move weight and
our technique, but still allowing us time to backfill with more work in the supplemental
portion. This is also why, once the
leaders are done and one moves onto the anchors, they get to experience so much
growth; because resting on the mainwork and pushing the supplemental stuff laid
down the foundation for this growth.