I have
observed confusion regarding training frequency often enough (HAH) that I feel
it’s time to address it as I understand it.
This won’t be anything new in terms of the ideas I’ve expressed, but I
feel it will help frame the subject in a manner that will make it more
understandable.
Ya know...something like this
A prevailing
belief at the moment is that frequency of training a movement is the primary determinant
in building said movement. One must
squat frequently in order to build a bigger squat, one must deadlift frequently
in order to build a bigger deadlift, etc.
This is why programs like Starting Strength are popular for beginner
lifters and Smolov popular for non-beginners; they have on frequently
performing a lift, so they are good at building said lift.
This
understanding creates confusion when analyzing programs with low frequency of
lifts. Plain vanilla 5/3/1 has you
perform each lift once a week, Westside doesn’t have you perform the
competition lift UNTIL the meet, DoggCrapp takes 2 weeks before you come back
to a lift, etc etc. These programs WORK,
and people can’t understand HOW. How can
you possibly improve the squat if you aren’t squatting? The answer always boils down to steroids and
genetics, and this is simply the lazy way out of the problem. There is a real answer, and it’s far simpler,
yet not easy.
Beating the Hulk is simple; just punch him hard enough. No way is that easy though.
We once
again have arrived at the topic of skill vs strength; two ways one can improve
the lift. Performing the movement
frequently greatly improves the skill in performing the lift. This typically results in dramatic increases
in the amount of weight moved, as one rapidly improves their skill at the
movement and gets better and better at it with such frequent practice. It’s like practicing and instrument; the more
you pick it up and play the scales, the better you get. However, skill can only be so perfected
before one has reached the point of diminishing returns, which is why we
eventually witness plateaus and, in most cases, regression after one has “overpracticed”
the movement through frequency.
Eventually, repetitive motion injuries set in and it is time to reduce
frequency in order to recover.
So the other
way to improve a lift? Strength, as we
mentioned earlier. How do we improve
strength? By strengthening the muscles
involved IN the lift itself. Now,
popular internet folklore would have you believe that the best assistance
movement for the squat IS the squat.
This is once again the work of people who don’t like thinking. These people misunderstand the difference
between strength and skill. When given
the task to make their squat stronger, they simply interpret that to mean “squat
more weight”, so they pick the avenue that results in rapid improvement; skill
work. Strength takes TIME to
develop. Strength doesn’t accumulate
rapidly, which is why most folks don’t like to build it. It’s unrewarding to get stronger, and most
folks would rather get better.
Or this I suppose
This is how
programs like 5/3/1, Westside, DoggCrapp, etc, all improve the numbers on
lifts; they make STRONGER lifters, not necessarily BETTER lifters. These programs are more focused on improving
the muscles involved in the lift and developing the ability of the trainee to
strain and grind. These programs tend to
be rife with assistance work that isn’t at all similar to the movement being
trained. Westside is especially
notorious for this, with lots of sled dragging, reverse hypers, glute ham
raises, etc, all to build the posterior chain. DoggCrapp is a “bodybuilding
program”, but I benched the most I ever did in a powerlifting meet while I was
following it, and many followers report amazing strength gains while following it. Even though the movement isn’t being
practiced much (if at all), the muscles involved are becoming STRONGER, and as
a result, improvements on the lift are observed.
Why can’t it
be both? Why can’t it be that frequency
ALSO builds strength? Well, as already
discussed, too much frequency is a bad thing.
Repetitive motion injuries are common (look up all the horror stories of
people following Smolov and having the hips and knees of an 80 year old…and
they consider that something to be proud of), and performing the same max
effort movement for more than 3 weeks tend to result in burnout, while changing
things around keeps your body fresh. One
other significant point to consider is this; if you perform ONLY the squat to
improve your squat, you will always strengthen the same strongpoints and neglect
the same weakpoints. If the movement
does not change, neither does the stimulus, and you will eventually reach the
point where your weakpoints are holding back your ability to employ your
strongpoints. If your squat style
emphasizes your hamstrings and downplays your quads, eventually your quads will
be too weak to allow you to recruit your hamstrings, because your squat style
has done NOTHING to bring up your quads.
However, if you run a cycle of front squats, or reverse sled drags, or
god forbid leg extensions, you will actually strengthen your neglected area to
the point that you can tap further into the potential you’ve built.
This
understanding is necessary to intelligently make decisions regarding
training. Too many people oppose a
program like 5/3/1 for a beginner because it “lacks frequency”, but this is an amateur
understanding of the process. A beginner
that employs a program with low frequency of movements might observe slow
improvements on the amount of weight moved, but this doesn’t indicate a slow
progression of strength built. The
strength may not be REALIZED as quickly as possible…but why does that
matter? Why is it that the same
beginners who say they have no interest in competing are all locked into this
weird pseudo competition to see who can squat 225lbs first? You can “maximize beginner gains” at the
start by rapidly practicing a few movements before you eventually plateau and
HAVE to spend time in a dedicated strength BUILDING phase OR you could just
build strength while also getting some practice in and just keep up the
increases at a steady pace. The “slow”
progression of programs like 5/3/1 is simply the process of building strength
as you realize it, which means you can just keep training for an almost
indefinite period of time while observing steady increases in the amount of
weight moved.
I mean...it worked for this guy
I mean…doesn’t
that sound awesome?
Great article. I'm no where near your strength level, but I came to the same conclusion as well after injuring myself over and over from trying to make progress too quickly.
ReplyDeleteAwesome man, glad you appreciated it. It's one of those things that we "know" when we're knew but forget as time goes on; you get bigger and stronger by lifting weights. People want to overcomplicate it, but there really doesn't need to be anything more than that.
Delete