Everyone tells me that beginners are magical unicorns that
have the ability to linearly progress from workout to workout, and that it is
the absence of this ability that defines when one is no longer a beginner. You ascend to intermediacy once you can no
longer progress between workouts, and must instead only progress weekly, and
one becomes advanced once they can only progress monthly. That, is of course, ridiculous. What has happened here is that people have
too narrowly defined what “progress” actually is, and in turn, they have
narrowed their own pursuit of progress to the point that they miss out on
opportunities to constantly improve. Why
limit yourself? You should be progressing
EVERY workout.
Like, just keep gradually increasing the size of the bosu ball
Like, just keep gradually increasing the size of the bosu ball
Here is the pitfall of how people are defining progress; they
believe that the only form of progress is more weight on the bar. This is endemic due to the recent preponderance
of “beginner programs” that focus purely on this goal. Always add more weight to the bar while
keeping everything else the same, and when you can’t do that any more, you have
reached the limits of linear progression and need more advanced
programming. But wait, why is weight
moved the only form of progress? If you
keep the weight the same but perform more reps, isn’t that progress? What about if you did more sets, wouldn’t that
be progress? More exercises? Shorter
rest times? Why aren’t these considered
progress?
This is the issue faced by the non-competitive trainee; they
have no actual end goal to vector their training toward. These people become obsessed with number
chasing, because it’s the only way to quantify their progress to the outside world. It’s the bizarre doublespeak inherent in this
generation of trainees; they abhor vanity and decry those who train “for looks”,
but clearly they want validation for their efforts by being able to brag about
weight lifted. That is why these
trainees are in constant pursuit of more weight on the bar; they want to be
able to report a higher number when someone asks “how much do you lift?” If they aren’t adding more weight to the bar,
how could they possibly be succeeding?
How will people KNOW how awesome they are unless they can tell them how
much they can lift?
I mean, I guess there are always tanktops
I mean, I guess there are always tanktops
An actual athlete training for an actual competition
understands that weight lifted is simply one of the many variables inherent
toward improved competitive performance, and as such place not nearly as much
importance on it. Even athletes in
sports where maximal weight lifted IS the end goal understand that not every
training session necessarily is focused on that specific goal at that specific
time. Some training sessions result in
improved conditioning, some in improved maximal strength, some in improved
skill, some in improved hypertrophy, etc.
It’s a balancing act, and overemphasis of one attribute means to exclude
other, equally valuable ones.
This is why the notion of tapped out linear progression is a
myth; one can and SHOULD be able to improve from workout to workout at just
about any level. The progress may not
necessarily be weight lifted, but it is STILL linear in that it exists from
workout to workout as a positive trend.
The trick is the find some way, ANY way, to progress. Yes, if all you focus on is putting more
weight on the bar, you will eventually stall hard, mainly because you neglected
to lay down the foundation necessary to continue to progress by training a
variety of necessary systems…but Christ, isn’t that insane? Why do these programs that are obsessed with
adding more weight to the bar intentionally set you up to fail? Why don’t they structure training in such a
way to ensure a lifetime of constant success and progress, rather than just
heading on a crash course to failure? I
can’t even fathom the insane logic.
For the gains of course!
Here are some other great ways to continue to progress from
workout to workout. Yes, first there is
adding more weight to the bar. However,
you can also keep the weight the same but add more total reps. On Pavel’s 3-5, that was how we progressed. You’d do 5 sets of as many reps as you could
without going over 5. Once that total
amount of reps equaled 25, you upped the weight. Constant linear progression, even while
weight stayed the same. Other ways to
progress include adding more sets. This
is a sneaky way to add more reps and volume to the work. If you did 10x3 for 1 workout, 11x3 IS
progress. Another way would be to reduce
rest times. If you watch the clock and
are averaging 3 minutes of rest per set, get it down to 2:30 while keeping
everything else the same, and sure as crap, you just made some progress. Another way is to increase the state of
fatigue that you’re performing your work under.
If you can perform 3x15 glute ham raises after deadlifting 500lbs for a
single, and then you go and deadlift 515 for a single and hit 3x15 GHRs after,
THAT is progress. Another awesome way to
progress is increased bar speed. If you
keep the weight, reps and sets the same but are moving the bar faster than
before, THAT is progress. Yet another
way to progress is changing the conditions of your pre-training ritual. If you normally deadlift 600lbs on 3 full
meals late in the afternoon and you work up to that on an empty stomach first
thing in the morning, THAT is progress.
And those are all just off the top of my head people. There is an unfathomable amount of ways to
continue to progress from workout to workout without EVER increasing the amount
of weight lifted. The people telling you
that this quality is only inherent in absolute beginners and more advanced
trainees are handicapped are just trying to sell you something or justify their
own failures. Always be improving; have
a goal for each session and absolutely annihilate it.
I'm just saying, there is a clear correlation between constantly annihilating things and being huge and unstoppable
I'm just saying, there is a clear correlation between constantly annihilating things and being huge and unstoppable
Life is too short to waste time NOT getting better.
You know, I came around to giving this philosophy a shot. After giving Starting Strength my best shot I started to have a nagging hip injury from setting squat PRs 3 times a week. I think that program only works if you are willing to literally eat 5000 calories a day from day one and allow yourself to look like Zach Evetts at the end of it. Which I wouldn't care about, but from what I've seen, losing 40 lbs of fat is a more arduous task than Rippetoe makes it out to be.
ReplyDeleteAfter reading 531, I think the "start too light, progress too slowly" way of doing it is a smarter idea. That way, you're avoiding overuse injuries and giving your body a chance to adapt to the work, leading to less plateaus.
I think that after 6 months of training, you would end up in almost the same place with both programs, despite adding less weight to the bar with 531. Because with SS you will inevitably stall a couple of times and then reduce the weight to recover, which in the long-term has essentially the same effect as taking a slower progression in the first place.
I think SS is only useful for a total novice who wants to quickly find out what their level of strength is. But actually following the program to its end seems like a poor cost-benefit because you will end up losing much of that strength when it comes time to cut.
Sounds like you came to some solid realizations there dude. Took me a long time to really appreciate this (hell, my first few blog entries were the total opposite of this), but it's as you identified; limited utility with more cons thans pros.
Delete