This idea hit me while I was driving this morning, as many of my ideas do. It’s rather interesting to think about how the biggest changes we employ in our approach are what are responsible for the biggest changes we observe in our journey in physical transformation. That should seem like an obvious concept, yet, when observing the thoughts and actions of trainees, we frequently note a preoccupation with the SMALLEST and least significant drivers of progress. Jim Wendler’s “majoring in the minors” concept. I feel it’s necessary for us to step back, observe the similarities that exist in (what appears to be) vastly different approaches to physical transformation so that we can understand the significance OF the big tools employed to affect big changes, and thereby be able to appreciate when and why the small stuff matters. I adopt the analogy of a sculptor: when they start off with the large bit of stone, they hack away at it with hammer and hatchet at first, and as they get closer and closer to the fine details, THEN they switch to the smaller, more precise tools. If you try to start carving a sculpture with a fine chisel and tiny hammer, you will drive yourself mad and achieve nothing over the course of your lifetime.
Maybe if you had 600 years...or 17...
What’s one
of the biggest tools we have available in our toolbox of transformation? ACTION.
Simply do SOMETHING. Again, that
seems obvious, but consider HOW many trainees run into “analysis
paralysis”. I’ve known of “trainees”
that have spent MONTHS researching an approach before committing to it…and
during that time, they simply resumed their current state of inaction, engaging
in NO training or nutritional protocol whatsoever, since they had not completed
their research yet. Let us all
appreciate the common variables here: no one ever changed by doing the same
thing they were doing: change only happens when we change SOMETHING, and we can
change something by DOING something.
Simply doing 10 push ups a day, every day, will achieve SOME sort of
change compared to NOT doing those push ups.
So if we’re ever in doubt of what needs to happen to achieve physical
transformation, we can agree that action is required.
From there,
we also observe the common variable held across all systems of physical
transformation: they make the trainee do SOMETHING. HIT is different from Crossfit, is different
from Deep Water, is different from 5/3/1, is different from Easy Strength, is
different from bro-splits, is different from Reactive Training Systems, is
different from Juggernaut, etc etc. They
employ different exercises, sets, reps, methodologies, etc…but they all have
the trainee do SOMETHING, and there is an expectation that the trainee will do
this SOMETHING in good faith: with honest effort, dedicated toward the pursuit
of physical transformation. And as I
just recently wrote on the subject of willpower: as long as you aren’t FAKING it,
and are actually trying, all systems will work.
Dan John went on to say “everything works…for about 6 weeks”, which is
WHY we had monthly muscle mags that came out with a new program each issue: it
was just in time to switch off your old “stale” program and start a new one,
which would work until the next one. ACTION
is required for change, and these protocols afford us an ability to vector that
action along a specific trajectory, but that’s all they are: a vector. Programs are organized methods to balance the
variables of intensity, volume and recovery: they (in theory) help direct on
how much and how hard to train to create the stimulus to change, and also
dictate the frequency in order to facilitate our ability to recover and,
therefore, GROW from the stimulus.
What happens when we have too much recovery and not enough stimulus
We see this
in the nutritional sphere as well. Every
nutritional intervention is that: an intervention. It’s a hard and sharp stop to what we’re
currently doing and pivoting to a different direction, primarily because,
again: what we were doing WASN’T working.
The biggest pitfall of most people regarding nutrition is the sheer fact
they don’t think about it at all. Most
folks have NO plan when it comes to nutrition.
That may seem baffling when written out like that, but when you stop to
think about it, it’s true: most people are just “winging it”. People will open their fridge or pantry
HOPING to find something in there: not even KNOWING what food they have in
their OWN house. These people wake up in
the morning, either skip breakfast, grab something out of a box in their house,
or pick up something on their way to work/school, figure out what they’re going
to eat for lunch when lunch rolls around, and pick up something for dinner on
the way home, the entire time only stopping the intake of food once the food
has run out. For these people, ANY
manner of nutritional intervention is going to achieve physical transformation.
This is why
we see successes with vegan, keto, paleo, carnivore, IIFYM, Weight Watchers,
Vertical Diet, Snake Diet, Intermittent Fasting, the Mediterranean diet,
etc. ALL of these approaches require the
user to stop and THINK about what it is they’re putting into their face. That ALONE is a huge driver of change. Beyond that, quite often, it’s not about what
you’re eating but what you’re NOT eating that is the driver of physical
transformation. Carnivore is an all meat
diet, the Vertical Diet will have the trainee taking in rice by the THOUSANDS
of calories as a backfill…but both programs are about NOT eating seed oils,
processed foods, and so many of the other nutritional pitfalls out there. Even the critics OF extreme approaches like
carnivore relent that it’s STILL better than the standard American diet,
because even IF someone focuses a diet entirely on a “known carcinogen” like
red meat, AT LEAST that person isn’t eating Pop Tarts, Captain Crunch, deep
fried Twinkies, beer, peanut butter cups, and all the other ridiculous nonsense
that makes up the current diet that we FOR SURE know is killing us.
Oh for f**k's sake it's COOKIES FOR BREAKFAST! It should come with an insulin syringe for a prize
And herein
we’ve already identified a roadmap for success: pick A program and A diet and
you will accomplish about 90% of whatever your goal is. You will affect the BIGGEST changes toward
physical transformation WITH these biggest tools: a MASSIVE overhaul of how you
train and how you eat: effectively, how you live. NO nuance needs to be discussed at this
point: we didn’t NEED to wonder if whey protein isolate was a better post
workout protein compared to concentrate, we didn’t NEED to wonder if dumbbell lateral
raises were superior to cable raises, we didn’t NEED to ponder the impacts of
fasted cardio vs fed cardio: we simply needed to get the big rocks
established. But WHY are we so inclined
to break out the small tools before the big ones?
Because when
we observe those that have achieved success, it seems like ALL they discuss ARE
the small tools. About how nutritional timing was the ONE thing that was
holding them back, about how turning their pinky on lateral raises FINALLY got
their medial delts to respond, about how sets of 6 were FAR superior to sets of
5. If this is what the best of the best
are pre-occupied with, why not those who wish to walk among them? Because these folks ALREADY mastered the big
tools: they EARNED the right to focus on the minutia. And at THAT point in your development, the
minutia IS what matters. Everyone in the
final heat of World’s Strongest Man already KNOWS how to get big and strong;
now it’s a matter of WHO has the best gameday plan: who has the PERFECTLY timed
pre-event nutrition that digests well, doesn’t elevate the heart rate and
controls insulin spikes? Everyone at Mr.
Olympia already KNOWS how to achieve a champion-level physique: now it’s a
matter of who can best present it on that HOUR of that day. No one got here by screwing up the big tools
and mastering the chisel: they were ALL masters of the mallet and hatchet.
Axe mastery and being jacked tend to go hand-in-hand
But if you
go check out someone like Dan John, you find someone who specializes ON these
big tools, because Dan recognizes that, as far as generating the MOST
significant impacts on the most significant portion of the population, THIS is
what needs to get focused on. And when
you read what Dan writes and hear him speak, he is the master at getting right
to what matters: little and often over the long haul. And when you hear Dan talk about his
programs, the language makes it clear as well.
“Use a heavy weight here” “Use a weight where you don’t need to
strain”. There’s no RPE calculation, no
percentages, no need to know your maxes: you simply have to SHOW UP and
train. His nutrition recommendations are
the same “Eat protein, vegetables and water”.
Why? Because if you get THAT part
down, the rest will follow, but if you can’t even do that: what good will it do
you to have the best protein supplement?
It’s a supplement for a reason: it’s supposed to be employed AFTER the
nutritional protocol has been established: not in PLACE of the protocol.
The big
tools create the big changes. A plan
creates change: it doesn’t matter WHAT that plan is. And BIG changes to the plan create BIG
changes in turn. If you’re not gaining
weight, you’re not going to suddenly start doing that when you add 100 calories
to your diet. 100 calories is a rounding
error when adding mayo to a sandwich.
100 calories is when you accidentally take a 3rd Oreo out of the sleeve
instead of a second. When we want to
create significant change, we need to use BIG tools to hack, hammer and cleave
away. When we want to gain, we LIVE
gaining for that period, and we take on the ridiculous programs like Super
Squats or Mass Made Simple or Deep Water and we eat the COPIOUS amount of food
to recover from the skullsplitting training.
THERE are the big tools: SUPER hard training and SUPER big eating. It’s a gallon of milk a day for Super Squats,
PBJs for Mass Made Simple and pounds of flesh for Deep Water, but we see the
common trend: it’s a LOT of food. And
when we lose fat, we see the big tools there: LESS food, because that’s how we
lose fat. We’re not going to get there
with baby steps and a light touch: big tools for the big changes, and,
eventually, we earn the right to break out the small chisel.
I do love Dan's prescription for easy strength for choosing weights. If it's too easy - add weight. If you struggled or missed a weight, it was too heavy. No percentages or schedules, just using feedback to gauge progress.
ReplyDeleteMe too, and I ALSO love how it drives so many folks nuts because they want a VERY specific answer, haha. There needs to be a human element to it.
DeleteWhen I decided to pick up a barbell I was completely baffled when I googled where to start. Reddit was the worst, for every person saying Starting Strength needed to be run for 3 years to establish a "strength base" you had someone else saying it was rubbish without offering any real alternative.
ReplyDeleteWhat I wanted was principles, not "do this" because I wanted to equip myself with the knowledge to know what I was doing and why, but I feel like once nerds got into lifting they wound up seeing more value in arguing over why a beginner needs to do 5x5 instead of 3x8, the same way they argue over why Star Wars is Fantasy not Science Fiction.
I've learnt to avoid these people now.
Talked to my ex-bodybuilder mate and the advice was simple: "4 sessions a week, 3-4 exercises per bodypart, 12 sets total, 8-12 reps a set. Try to eat a lot of protein and fibre." He just wanted me to start SOMETHING and get used to training. Along the way I had questions for him and he offered deeper insight that let me experiment with the basic guidelines he initially gave me. I recently thanked him for changing my life (literally) and he said while he was glad he could help, it wasn't really much effort because most people he's tried to get into lifting have quit after a couple of months.
I loved his suggestions because I could play around a bit and find what exercises worked for me, run them for a month and then switch things up. I trained this way for 9 months, then ran Layne Norton's PHAT for 3 months. Good program but I never want to run it again.
Gained 10kg/22lbs of lean muscle in that year (pants are looser in the wasitline than the were a year ago but shirts are tighter), wound up with a 315lb squat and 405lb deadlift. Lifted for reps, not estimated with a 1rm calculator. These are not championship numbers by any means, but for the kid who got picked last every single gym class, I'm pretty damn proud of myself and it's made me ask... well, what else am I capable of that I'm currently unaware of?
My bench press and overhead press are laughable because I was working around a (non-lifting related) collarbone injury, but a lot of rear delt, trap and lat work with cables has helped with that. The next step in my journey is to keep pushing forward but bring those lifts up to where I want them to be.
I am currently running 531 BBS incorporating backwards sled drags and keg carries as accessories, along with some light lat work and vanity stuff for my arms. I'm not gonna sign up to T-nation and ask Jim's permission, I'm just gonna do it and see what happens. If it makes me bigger and stronger great, if not I'll change my approach.
My point is, I think there are 3 things someone can do to train if they want to be successful:
1. Pick something that's proven to have worked
2. Stick with it
3. Avoid the internet while points 1 and 2 are still relevant
Once you've had 6-12 months in the trenches, you should have read enough and practiced enough to have some idea of what does and doesn't work, and you should realise that you have the FREEDOM to decide how YOU WANT TO TRAIN. It's your dime and your body. Stop waiting for someone else to come along with the perfect routine - to paraphrase Dan John, just pick the damn thing up and put it overhead.
Dude, thank you SO much for writing all of this. It was like a blogpost in an of it's own. There's SO much value to what you wrote. So much to be said for just embracing something and going for it. Avoiding the net is huge too. Don't let information hold you back.
Delete