A fun fact my readers MAY not know about me: I got married at age 21. I was engaged at 20, to a girl that I had been dating for a year, and had been best friends with for a year before that. We’re still together to this day, and are going stronger than ever. I say all this to show that I clearly do NOT have a fear of commitment: I knew a good thing when I found it and locked on like a shark. But from reading how some of you trainees out there operate, ya’ll put me to shame when it comes to not fearing commitment, because some of you dudes are locked in on a program/diet for LIFE. Or at least, that’s the impression I get, because you guys are trying to make the PERFECT program/diet to run for the rest of your lives. Ya’ll are ready for the long haul commitment, “till death do we part”, a true “ride or die”…and why? Why do you owe so much loyalty to a single method? What do you get from this? Learn from the lifelong bachelors out there: don’t get hitched to just one wagon, don’t buy the cow when you can get the milk for free (GOMAD anyone?), go sew your wild oats and enjoy all those fish in the sea. In general: fear commitment.
Here’s what
I see: a trainee says “I want a program for hypertrophy”. Hey, great, go do Super Squats, Mass Made Simple,
5/3/1 Building the Monolith or 5/3/1 BBB Beefcake. They’ll all get you big. Within minutes, having not run a single DAY
of the program, let alone a week, let alone a training block, the trainee fires
back with “It doesn’t have any lateral raises/not enough curls/no calf
raises/etc: this program isn’t for me”.
Dude, you wanted a hypertrophy program: these programs will get you big. That’s what they do. Are they absent of those movements? Yeah, sure.
Know how you solve that? AFTER
you run these programs, you go do a program that DOES have these movements
built into it. Not EVERY program you run
has to have EVERY movement you want to run.
Sometimes, movements get left out for THIS program so that they can be
employed in ANOTHER program. Because
it’s true that there are a LOT of great movements out there to get big and
strong and, in turn, EVERY decision we make is a decision with an opportunity
cost. We do barbell bench at the expense
of dumbbell bench, we do squats at the expense of front squats, not all things
can be done all the time. But the
solution is simple: we’ll just do those other movements LATER. We’re not going to be married to this one
program: we’re going to go out with it, have some fun, and then say “see ya
later”. And we very well MAY see it
later, if we really DID have a good time with it. And if we didn’t, hey: plenty of fish in the
sea. It’s why we date: to see what’s out
there.
It's no
different with diet, and once again, I’ll go to the topic of getting jacked,
because that’s more fun to talk about.
“I wanna get big: what should I eat?”
Super Squats says a gallon of milk a day, Jim Wendler had his athletes
do 1.5lbs of ground beef and a dozen eggs, Dan John recommends the Peanut
Butter and Jelly sandwich between meals (as does Paul Carter: very opposite
sides of the coin reaching similar conclusions), etc. What, inevitably follows up? “Isn’t that unhealthy?” I mean, maybe, sure. Let’s say it objectively is: does that
matter? It’s 6 weeks: just how much
damage can you do to yourself in 6 weeks?
How long will it take to undo 6 weeks of damage? Especially if you came into this IN good
shape to start with. This isn’t a “for
life” suggestion: this is a SPECIFIC approach for a specific block of
training. We match the nutrition with
the training, because otherwise we WASTE the training by not providing our body
the fuel it needs to achieve the objectives.
Once again, no one is saying “do this forever”: once you’ve gotten what
you need, you get out. This is the “one
night stand”…just for 6 weeks. Maybe
consider it more like a summertime fling.
This is why
periodization is a thing. This is why
there are “training seasons”. But
there’s an issue with that: one needs to be able to appreciate that there WILL
be a future, and this, in turn, means a willingness to engage in some critical
thinking and explore the realm of nuance.
People don’t want to do that: they want to make ONE decision ONE time
and then just shut off their brains forever.
It’s why you see people run Starting Strength for 4 years, just running
into the exact same stall over and over again, backing down the weights,
ramping them back up, and stalling again.
They only wanted to take the time to learn ONE program (if that…most
folks are just running an app to do all their thinking for them) and just do
that forever. Because learning TWO
programs was too much…like, legit, read Super Squats: it gives you TWO programs
to run back to back, and if you did just that and nothing else you could
DEFINITELY get pretty damn far. You need
to be willing to play the field at least a LITTLE bit. I can keep up the analogy here and say that
you can get married, but you’ll want to have a mistress. Just SOMETHING to keep the spark alive. Dan John (who is NOT an advocate of bigamy,
just to be clear) has “Bus bench-park bench” which is more than awesome to
explain this. You could easily take Easy
Strength and Mass Made Simple and just run them back to back forever and be
good. It honestly doesn’t take much to
get these benefits, but it takes SOMETHING.
It takes SOME degree of willingness to change.
I get it:
change is scary. This is how people end
up in dead end relationships: they love the security of the relationship more
than they love the actual person on the other end of that relationship. But those relationships are so hollow they
achieve the opposite of the intended effect: you’re now existing in isolation
WHILE cohabitating with someone. You rob
yourself of the potential to actually have a connection with another human
because you are TECHNICALLY “taken” and no longer available, yet you’re not
getting ANY of the actual benefit of a real relationship. Getting locked into these “forever” programs
and diets do the exact same thing to you.
You will stagnate to the point that the effort you’re putting into the
training and nutrition is having a NEGATIVE effect. Once again: all decisions are an opportunity
cost, and that hour you spent on workout 1,948 of Starting Strength where you
just hit the same numbers as last time was an hour that could have been spent
training ANYTHING else…or even an hour spent DOING anything other than that
worthless workout. Because MAINTAINING
muscle doesn’t require that much effort: we could’ve done that in 20
minutes. And it’s the same if we’re not
going to vary our diet in any meaningful way to match our training: why did we
just crush ourselves for an hour doing Super Squats if we’re just going to
intermittent fast for 16 hours and then eat 1800 calories in our eating window? Yeah, maybe that “works” day-to-day, but this
is a NEW day: it needs a new approach.
Because if we do the same thing all the time it just gets stale
Fear
commitment. You’ve got your whole life
to settle down: go out and have some fun.
I love this concept.
ReplyDeleteAlso, im starting on week 6 of easy strength and have to say, its actually a pretty solid program, even if it looks pretty simple.
Theres also something like at least three versions of it in the omnibook, if not more.
Not to mention, all thebdifferent exercise listings, that dan john suggests.
And then, of course, theres the whole idea of the ant tattooist, who has to have everything spelled out for them. (Which is also about where i am with the book)
Glad you're enjoying the book dude! One of the best things about Easy Strength was how much room it leaves for "Everything else". Combining it with Mass Made Simple made so much sense to me.
DeleteAnd what i gathered from his ant tattoist remarks were that these are the type of people who have to have everything spelled out for them, and thats kind of annoying because theybdont put any thought into anything at all.
ReplyDeleteI think the issues as described are due to a lack of clear expectations or goals. Committing to a 1600lb total provides some direction and an endpoint, but stalling long term on a program and sticking with it just means there wasn't any goal beyond running a program.
ReplyDeleteI think Mike Mentzer took off for a few months because online video content persuaded people to periodize from 5x5 to widowmakers for the first time.
You raise a very good point: for some folks, the method IS the goal. They just care about establishing a routine, and quickly it becomes a rut.
DeleteMentzer's recent rediscovery definitely speaks to the impact of social media influence. It's amazing how this stuff all comes around.